2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different sorbent materials for solid-phase extraction of selected drugs in human urine analyzed by UHPLC–UV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 st layer of filtering consists of removing salts, urea and macromolecular aggregates from urine and changing the solvent to maximize the catalyst performance, all of which are achieved by Solid Phase Extraction (SPE). Screening of a variety of commercially available SPE cartridges, differing by their selectivity and the retention mechanism, 17 and optimization of the extraction protocol was achieved by targeting endogenous nicotinamide (NA). This compound occurs in urine at low-μM concentrations 6 and can be detected by NMR using SABRE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1 st layer of filtering consists of removing salts, urea and macromolecular aggregates from urine and changing the solvent to maximize the catalyst performance, all of which are achieved by Solid Phase Extraction (SPE). Screening of a variety of commercially available SPE cartridges, differing by their selectivity and the retention mechanism, 17 and optimization of the extraction protocol was achieved by targeting endogenous nicotinamide (NA). This compound occurs in urine at low-μM concentrations 6 and can be detected by NMR using SABRE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method is simple, and unlike conventional SPE method, it does not require a lengthy evaporation step. [51][52][53] The tested drugs demonstrated good recoveries when spiked to urine samples (72.8-116%). Another strength of the work lies in the fact that the high potential of the extracting the compounds with diverse polarities simultaneously.…”
Section: Comparison With Previously Reported Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If the template molecule is the smallest one in the group, the other molecules are not expected to fit into the cavities created and then the specificity is achieved. In addition to their selectivity and specificity, MIPs are preferred due to their low cost, ease of preparation in a short time, having high stability and activity during a wide range of conditions and robustness [ 7 , 13 , 14 ]. The SPE method in which MIPs are used as sorbents is called molecular imprinted solid-phase extraction (MISPE) [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%