2013
DOI: 10.1111/pace.12095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Electroanatomical Mapping Systems: Accuracy in Left Atrial Mapping

Abstract: The OneModel software produces maps that are more accurate in rendering complex cardiac structures compared to traditional software.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a combination of both impedance and electromagnetic technologies, the system achieves a coordinate system accuracy of 2 mm. The simultaneous collection of anatomic and electrical points from multiple electrodes leads to a significantly faster point collection vs. manual mapping [ 29 ] and superiority in high point density through the creation of 3-D models [ 30 ]. According to our first experience, the system is feasible and safe to use for a zero-fluoroscopic approach of SVTs, which results in a significant reduction of radiation exposure to the patients and staff both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a combination of both impedance and electromagnetic technologies, the system achieves a coordinate system accuracy of 2 mm. The simultaneous collection of anatomic and electrical points from multiple electrodes leads to a significantly faster point collection vs. manual mapping [ 29 ] and superiority in high point density through the creation of 3-D models [ 30 ]. According to our first experience, the system is feasible and safe to use for a zero-fluoroscopic approach of SVTs, which results in a significant reduction of radiation exposure to the patients and staff both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are differences among the different mapping systems: while some use magnetic data solely (eg, CARTO ® from Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA), others use both magnetic and impedance data for mapping (eg, EnSite Precision™ from Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA) and are reported to have up to 27 times greater capability in point acquisition density. 15 To add to this, both types of systems can deliver propagation maps with local activation time. However, only the latter (ie, EnSite Precision™ from Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA) has the SparkleMap feature that allows the operator to view live peak-to-peak voltage activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%