Comparison of Human Mandibular Osteoblasts Grown on Two Commercially Available Titanium Implant Surfaces

Abstract

Although cells grown on both surfaces exhibited good adhesion capabilities, a well-differentiated osteoblastic phenotype, and maintained a clear proliferation potential, our study suggests that plasma-sprayed treatment offers a better performance than SLA by creating, at least in the early phases, better conditions for tissue healing.

Dental Implant Surface Enhancement and Osseointegration

“…Sandblasting results in surface roughness and acid etching leads to microtexture and cleaning (Galli et al, 2005). These surfaces are known to have better bone integration as compared to the above-stated methods (Bornstein et al, 2008).…”

Differences of Post-Placement Bone Implant Contact (BIC) Value of Dental Implant Coated and Not Coated With Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)

“…This proves that the use of PRP increases the initial reaction of bone-forming cells on the surface of the dental implant. (Galli, 2005) The use of PRP on the dental implant surface not only improved the healing process of bone dental implants compared with the control, but also increased the BIC in treatment group statistically significant (P = 0.029) than The researchers placed an dental implant on two minipig jaw sides. In their study, PDGFs were applied to one dental implant while the other was installed without growth factor.…”

Effects of a Nano-structured Surface Layer on Titanium Implants for Osteoblast Proliferation Activity

“…The geometric structure and surface-preparation of implants plays a central role in primary and secondary stabilization [42]. The most common methods for modifying surface morphology are chemical etching [43][44][45], sand-blasting [46], these two in combination [47], grit blasting [48], surface melting by laser [49], and anodic oxidation [50,51].…”