“…For example, Zafra et al [53] recently demonstrated that ITDS and EP methods yielded similar average diffusivities for thin (<1 mm thick) sheet specimens of cold-rolled pure Fe. Critically, this direct comparison revealed that the error in replicate ITDS measurements was noticeably reduced relative to the replicate EP experiments [53]. It is well-known that EP experiments are prone to significant scatter, which has been historically attributed to numerous factors: the need for sample conditioning prior to starting the permeation experiment [28,[54][55][56][57][58], surface effects [59,60], trapping effects [61][62][63], concentration-dependent diffusion [64,65], analysis method assumptions [52,[66][67][68], failure to reach true steady-state conditions [69], and test-to-test variations in specimen thickness, environmental parameters, among other [70,71].…”