Protection and Restoration of Urban and Rural Streams 2004
DOI: 10.1061/40695(2004)18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Hydrological Responses from Low Impact Development with Conventional Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent monitoring project compared the hydrologic characteristics of runoff from a conventional residential development to an LID area in Maryland (Cheng et al 2003). The LID watershed was constructed with grass swales and bioretention throughout.…”
Section: Case Studies and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent monitoring project compared the hydrologic characteristics of runoff from a conventional residential development to an LID area in Maryland (Cheng et al 2003). The LID watershed was constructed with grass swales and bioretention throughout.…”
Section: Case Studies and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, data is not gathered from integrated LID installations after construction (Clar 2005), though these sites are constructed with specific hydrologic design goals and calculations. In particular, data of this kind are rarely published in peer-reviewed journals and are more commonly published in conference proceedings and layman's journals (e.g., Cheng et al 2003 andTrimbath 2006). Schneider and McCuen (2006) LID research is more frequently conducted in laboratories, on an individual LID feature, or through computer models.…”
Section: Post-construction Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%