2004
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors

Abstract: Long-term results are reported in 23 patients and short-term results in 30 patients presenting with bone tumors treated by curettage or resection followed by implantation of hydroxyapatite (HA) or highly purified beta-tricalcium phosphate (␤-TCP), respectively. Mean follow-up was 97 and 26 months in cases involving HA implantation and ␤-TCP implantation, respectively. Radiographs revealed HA incorporation into host bone in all but two cases; moreover, no obvious evidence of HA biodegradation was observed. A si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
189
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
189
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The biologic similarity to natural bone results in optimal biocompatibility and ensures that it is well tolerated by the body [5]. Moreover, it is claimed to be a unique bi-phasic hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate having a bioceramic matrix that is inert and highly osteoconductive [6].…”
Section: Material-ossifi (β Tricalcium Phosphate Plus Hydroxyapatite)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biologic similarity to natural bone results in optimal biocompatibility and ensures that it is well tolerated by the body [5]. Moreover, it is claimed to be a unique bi-phasic hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate having a bioceramic matrix that is inert and highly osteoconductive [6].…”
Section: Material-ossifi (β Tricalcium Phosphate Plus Hydroxyapatite)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo studies have proved that even after 9 months of implantation sintered HA remained at the site with hardly any sign of resorption [11,12]. To circumvent this problem, HA has been combined with more soluble phases such as β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) [13][14][15][16]. Alternatively, more inherently soluble phases such as brushite/monetite have also demonstrated higher resorbability [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34), 35) The FTIR and XRD spectra also indicated the product had been transferred into desired target within 24 h. Ceramic TCP material could exist in animal body for 48 months, which had the same period for bone remodeling cycle in human body. 14) Meanwhile, ¢-TCMP have been reported to exist in animal body for longer period when compared to commercial ¢-TCP. 16) Hence, ¢-TCMP is a proper bone implant for bone regeneration.…”
Section: )22)mentioning
confidence: 99%