1989
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/34/6/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of in vivo scintillation probes and gamma cameras for detection of small, deep tumours

Abstract: An in vivo probe was compared with a gamma camera for the task of detecting radiolabelled tumour models in a water phantom. The probe, which contained a 1 cm diameter NaI(T1) detector, was designed and used by us for surgical staging studies of gynaecological patients. Tumours were spherical sources of different sizes and activities per unit volume of cobalt-57. The phantom was a tank of water (451) containing dissolved radioactivity to simulate background activity. Detector-to-source separations and tank dept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TNR detection threshold to confidently localize the residual brain tumor was arbitrarily set to 2. To provide a quantitative measurement of the tumor detectability, this signal to noise ratio can be related to an area under a receiver operative characteristic curve of 0.92 corresponding to a good probability of detection [40]. The TNR was measured in two different ways to simulate the two different acquisition modes of the intraoperative probe.…”
Section: ) Performances For Detection Of Residual Radiolabeled Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TNR detection threshold to confidently localize the residual brain tumor was arbitrarily set to 2. To provide a quantitative measurement of the tumor detectability, this signal to noise ratio can be related to an area under a receiver operative characteristic curve of 0.92 corresponding to a good probability of detection [40]. The TNR was measured in two different ways to simulate the two different acquisition modes of the intraoperative probe.…”
Section: ) Performances For Detection Of Residual Radiolabeled Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key aspect of this work, in contrast to earlier imaging work with low-Z scintillators or semiconductors [12,13,14,15,16,17], is the use of a thinner and higher effective-Z CsI(Tl) scintillator fabricated in the form of a microcolumnar structure. As shown in Figure 1, the scintillator consists of 3 to 5 µm diameter columns of CsI(Tl) Figure 1.…”
Section: The Micro Columnar Csi(tl) Scintillatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both theoretical considerations and experimental in vitro results predict that, providing the probe can be brought close to the tumor deposit (preferably within a centimeter), sensitivity with a hand-held gamma probe should be superior to that for an external camera across a wide range of radiopharmaceuticals, administered doses, tumor uptake, and camera design. 54 Experience with this approach is accumulating with immune, specific biochemical, and nonspecific physiologic radiopharmaceuticals. 55 Experience with radiolabeled B72.3 MAb and hand-held gamma probe intraoperative detection is described in a series of reports from Ohio State University.…”
Section: Radioimmunoguided Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%