Comparison of masticatory efficacy among complete denture wearers with two adhesives and dentate individuals: A randomized, crossover, double-blind clinical trial

Torres-Sánchez, Carlos; Montoya-Salazar, Vanessa; Torrés-Lagares, Daniel; Gutiérrez-Pérez, José; Jiménez-Castellanos, Emilio

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.020

Cited by 26 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All current DAs used in this study are similarly formulated on carboxymethylcellulose and their differences are based on the nonbonding synthetic agents, such as polyvinyl acetate, the copolymer of vinyl methyl ether or the maleic anhydride that extend the life of the DA effect, while the carboxymethylcellulose establishes cohesion between the denture and oral mucosa (Torres-Sánchez et al, 2017). Other components have been removed or added, such as zinc.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study

Flores-León

Domínguez-Pérez

Ruíz-Valdez

et al. 2020

Int. J. Odontostomat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no information about the possible impact in denture retention after the use of common denture adhesives (DAs) when poor denture foundations (PDF) are present. Moreover, there is a lack of information about which current formulation provides greater retention and for how long. Twelve models from edentulous patients with different ridge shape and border height were used and complete dentures were manufactured. Four different formulation brands of DAs were tested after 10 minutes and three, six, nine, and 12 hours of DA application using a universal testing machine. The Fittydent® and Fixodent® adhesives had the highest retention at 12 hours. The PDF group increased on average its retention by 400 %. However, the group presented lower retention compared to the good denture foundation group. In conclusion, DAs significantly increased denture retention. The PDF group were the most benefited with the application of DAs. The Fixodent® paste had the highest retention.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study

Flores-León

Domínguez-Pérez

Ruíz-Valdez

et al. 2020

Int. J. Odontostomat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerous studies have shown that CDAs with proper prescription of the dentist help to improve the retention and stability of well developed ( 7 , 8 , 12 - 20 ) CDs improving the quality of life and general health of the EP and his satisfaction with the use of the CDAs ( 18 - 24 ). In this way the patient satisfaction becomes the most decisive factor in the success of CDs ( 25 - 27 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Satisfaction in complete denture wearers with and without adhesives: A randomized, crossover, double-blind clinical trial

Torres-Sánchez¹,

Montoya-Salazar²,

Torrés-Lagares³

et al. 2018

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the satisfaction of patients regarding retention, stability and accumulation of particles with a randomized, double-blind crossed method in users with complete dentures with and without adhesive.Material and MethodsSeventeen edentulous individuals were randomized and received new upper and lower complete dentures. After a period of adaptation, they participated in some masticatory tests and clinical revisions, after use the protheses with and without the use of two denture adhesives: Adhesive A (Fittydent, Fittydent International GmbH) and adhesive B (Corega, GlaxoSmithKline) at 0, 7 and 14 days. Satisfaction was measured immediately after each test through a survey using a VAS scale (0-10) and data were analyzed with McNemar’s test with Bonferroni correction.ResultsThe results showed significant differences (p<.01) between the study groups with adhesive A - B and the group without adhesive, but no significant differences were found between the two stickers for any of the variables studied.ConclusionsComplete denture adhesives significantly improved the satisfaction of patients because a better retention, stability and less accumulation of particles of the food substitute between the denture and the mucosa is obtained compared with non-use of complete denture adhesives. Key words:Complete dentures, patient satisfaction, denture adhesives, clinical trials.

show abstract

“…One might infer that the sample size of participants may have contributed to this statistical result since other authors have found different results [9,15]. Nevertheless, there are studies with similar sample sizes that present different results as well [7,15,22]. Another study observed that denture adhesives results are more expressive for poor denture-bearing tissues and for ill-fitted dentures [21].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Denture Adhesives in New Complete Dentures During a Function

Guimarães¹,

Marques²,

Almagro³

et al. 2018

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Denture adhesives are often a matter of controversy. Patients seem to easily accept the use of denture adhesives, while professionals are more hesitant. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the self-perception, bite force and masticatory efficiency of complete denture wearers with denture adhesives. Methods: Fifteen complete denture wearers had their bite force measured by a gnathodynamometer in the molar region. Subjects also masticated 12 tablets of a chewable artificial test material for 35 masticatory cycles. The test material was washed, dried, sieved and weighed. Both tests were taken with and without the denture adhesive (Corega Ultra). The questionnaire Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was applied to evaluate self-perception with dentures. Results and Conclusion: Masticatory efficiency and bite force for the control group (without denture adhesive) and for the group with denture adhesive presented no statistically significant differences (p = 0.2080 and p = 0.2489, respectively). Self-perception according to the GOHAI index was great for 13% of participants, 40% considered it regular and 47% evaluated it as bad. Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the use of denture adhesive did not promote an improvement in bite force and masticatory efficiency. According to the GOHAI index, self-perception of the participants was classified as bad.

show abstract

Comparison of masticatory efficacy among complete denture wearers with two adhesives and dentate individuals: A randomized, crossover, double-blind clinical trial

Cited by 26 publications

References 48 publications

Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study

Comparison of the Retention of Conventional Dentures after the use of Common Adhesive Brands on Poor Denture Foundations. An in vitro Study

Satisfaction in complete denture wearers with and without adhesives: A randomized, crossover, double-blind clinical trial

Effect of Denture Adhesives in New Complete Dentures During a Function

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About