1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(89)80029-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for the measurement of apoproteins A1 and B in serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comparative study of commercial methods EIA gave poorer precision than RIA or immunonephelometry for both apoA-I and apoB. 84 The sensitivity of EIA is comparable to RID (Table 3). 62 …”
Section: Electroimmunoassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comparative study of commercial methods EIA gave poorer precision than RIA or immunonephelometry for both apoA-I and apoB. 84 The sensitivity of EIA is comparable to RID (Table 3). 62 …”
Section: Electroimmunoassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum ApoA-I and B were measured using Behring reagents and nephelometer (Maciejko et al, 1987;Meuffels & Hindmarsh, 1989) . The estimates of total imprecision were 5% for ApoA-I and 6% for ApoB.…”
Section: Apolipoprotein Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%