2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of metrics for the evaluation of similarity in acoustic pressure signals

Abstract: Determining if aeroacoustic sound predictions are accurate is difficult because the question of how to define 'accurate' remains open. This communication evaluates four metrics for comparing time-domain pressure signals, each implying its own definition of 'accurate.' An adaptation of a Structural Similarity Metric (originating from image processing literature) to time-frequency representations of acoustic signals is shown to outperform typical metrics such as relative energy and mean square error.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this function was initially developed for the evaluation of image quality 33 , 34 , it does not make any assumptions about its input data other than that it comes in the form of two matrices of same dimensionality, with numerical entries, irrespective of how the data in these matrices have been generated. Outside of the computer vision field, it is for example also used in transportation research to compare matrix representations of origin-destination graphs, which differ from chromatin contact graphs conceptually only in that they are directed graphs 69 , 70 , and as a similarity metric for acoustic pressure signals 71 , 72 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this function was initially developed for the evaluation of image quality 33 , 34 , it does not make any assumptions about its input data other than that it comes in the form of two matrices of same dimensionality, with numerical entries, irrespective of how the data in these matrices have been generated. Outside of the computer vision field, it is for example also used in transportation research to compare matrix representations of origin-destination graphs, which differ from chromatin contact graphs conceptually only in that they are directed graphs 69 , 70 , and as a similarity metric for acoustic pressure signals 71 , 72 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was inspired and adapted for use in the auditory domain from an image processing technique, structural similarity, or SSIM [35], which was created to predict the loss of image quality due to compression artifacts. Adaptations of SSIM have been used to predict audio quality [36] and more recently have been applied in place of simple mean squared error in aeroacoustics [37]. Computation of NSIM is described below in Section 4.2.3.…”
Section: Measuring Speech Quality Through Spectrogram Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first step in this direction has been presented by Breakey & Meskell. 26 A better understanding of this effect-and possible alleviations of it-will be available from viewing time-resolved spatial plots of the sound predictions near the array edges, a result available from the current time-domain prediction technique. These plots will be considered in future work.…”
Section: Ivd3 Evaluation Of Experimental Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%