2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of model and experimental ionospheric parameters at high latitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study undertakes a thorough evaluation of key IRI parameters including F 2 peak electron density (NmF 2 ), F2 peak height (hmF 2 ), M(3000)F 2 propagation factor, bottomside thickness (B0), and topside thickness. There have been several studies that have evaluated the performance of IRI hmF 2 and NmF 2 products in midlatitude and low-latitude regions [Sethi et al, 2008;Ehinlafa et al, 2010;Ezquer et al, 2011;Bilitza et al, 2012;Wichaipanich et al, 2012], but only a select few have attempted to do so in high-latitude regions [Oyeyemi et al, 2010;Ezquer et al, 2011;Magdaleno et al, 2011;Maltseva et al, 2013], none of which have been within the polar cap or at magnetic latitudes as high as what we shall be considering in this study. The performance of the IRI bottomside thickness models has been evaluated mainly in equatorial and midlatitude regions [Sethi and Mahajan, 2002;Blanch et al, 2007;Adeniyi et al, 2008;McKinnell et al, 2009;Lee and Reinisch, 2012], where virtually no evaluation has been undertaken at high latitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study undertakes a thorough evaluation of key IRI parameters including F 2 peak electron density (NmF 2 ), F2 peak height (hmF 2 ), M(3000)F 2 propagation factor, bottomside thickness (B0), and topside thickness. There have been several studies that have evaluated the performance of IRI hmF 2 and NmF 2 products in midlatitude and low-latitude regions [Sethi et al, 2008;Ehinlafa et al, 2010;Ezquer et al, 2011;Bilitza et al, 2012;Wichaipanich et al, 2012], but only a select few have attempted to do so in high-latitude regions [Oyeyemi et al, 2010;Ezquer et al, 2011;Magdaleno et al, 2011;Maltseva et al, 2013], none of which have been within the polar cap or at magnetic latitudes as high as what we shall be considering in this study. The performance of the IRI bottomside thickness models has been evaluated mainly in equatorial and midlatitude regions [Sethi and Mahajan, 2002;Blanch et al, 2007;Adeniyi et al, 2008;McKinnell et al, 2009;Lee and Reinisch, 2012], where virtually no evaluation has been undertaken at high latitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies [18][19][20] have shown that such use allows us to improve significantly the correspondence between the calculated and observational values of foF2 results have been obtained according to the European stations. Occurrence of new ionospheric stations in 2013-2014 allows to estimate efficiency of (med) on a global scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TEC is measured in TEC Units (TECU), where 1TECU = 10 16 electrons/m 2 . Results of papers [18,20] showed that in most cases the best correspondence with experimental foF2 values is provided by (JPL) for map JPL; however there can be separate regions or time periods when another map provides the best conformity with experimental data.…”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations