2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02093-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of optic nerve head measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
93
2
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
93
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The manual and automatic algorithms perform comparably. 14 To avoid introducing a subjective component into our analysis, we used the automatic algorithm. The automatic reference plane used for this study was 150 mm above the RPE, which had the best performance for glaucoma detection and correlation with visual function when compared with other reference planes positioned at 95 and 205 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The manual and automatic algorithms perform comparably. 14 To avoid introducing a subjective component into our analysis, we used the automatic algorithm. The automatic reference plane used for this study was 150 mm above the RPE, which had the best performance for glaucoma detection and correlation with visual function when compared with other reference planes positioned at 95 and 205 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,[12][13][14] The reproducibility of ONH measurements using the Stratus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) was reported recently to be sufficient, especially regarding the cup-to-disc ratios (CDRs). 15 Although OCT may give objective measurement with less variation than biomicroscopy, this in itself does not mean that it will be more accurate in estimating the actual disc measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Schuman et al 10 used two OCT versions to demonstrate a high degree of correlation between automated and manual disc margin identification for disc area, C/D area ratio, cup area, cup volume and rim volume. Using TDOCT, Iliev et al 11 found only 10 of 49 disc shapes required no modification, with the majority of disc margin points positioned outside the evident edge of the RPE/ choriocapillaris complex, leading to an apparent enlargement of the disc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Evidence from studies employing TDOCT has shown good agreement between manual and automated definitions of disc margin delineation, although these studies note that failure of proper disc margin recognition does occur. 10,11 Similarly, studies employing SDOCT have shown good agreement between automated and manual disc delineation methods; 12,13 however, statistically significant differences in ONH and RNFL parameters have been reported. 13 The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of manual vs automated RPE/BM endpoint demarcation on the measurements of ONH and all sectoral RNFL thickness parameters in a group of normal, GS, and glaucoma patients participating in the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma Study (AIGS) that demonstrate a wide range of glaucomatous damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…O exame foi considerado anormal quando pelo menos uma região testada apresentou-se com defeito severo, com significância estatística (p<0,01), ou dois defeitos moderados contíguos (p<0,02) em pelo menos dois exames confiáveis (23) .…”
Section: Campimetria De Frequência Duplicada -Fdtunclassified