2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of optomagnetic and AC susceptibility readouts in a magnetic nanoparticle agglutination assay for detection of C-reactive protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, light absorption of magnetic particles and clusters of magnetic particles may differ when exposed to an oscillating magnetic field. Fock et al, compared the performance of a C-reactive protein (CRP) biosensor with a newly proposed optomagnetic and alternating current (AC) susceptibility readout [ 217 ]. Both methods detect agglutination of magnetic particles.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanoparticles In the Real Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, light absorption of magnetic particles and clusters of magnetic particles may differ when exposed to an oscillating magnetic field. Fock et al, compared the performance of a C-reactive protein (CRP) biosensor with a newly proposed optomagnetic and alternating current (AC) susceptibility readout [ 217 ]. Both methods detect agglutination of magnetic particles.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanoparticles In the Real Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] Moreover, we found that the formation of particle dimers and small clusters was best observed as a change of the phase lag of the signal, which is insensitive to variations in the MNP concentration. 27 Typical time-resolved optomagnetic spectra are shown in accelerate the recognition rate and lower the detection limit. 32,33 To improve the performance of the proposed NickRCA-based biosensor, magnetic incubation cycles were performed between optomagnetic measurements (see Supplementary Section S2 and Figure S1).…”
Section: Tandem-actingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental platform of this study was a Poly We have used this affinity-purified CRP antibody because of its well-proven specificity to bind with CRP molecule [21]. CRP-free serum (Hytest Ltd., Turku, Finland) was used for sample dilution and negative control experiments.…”
Section: Materials and Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical laboratories, the CRP concentration is determined using a latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay [19], [20] on a human serum sample exposed to a number of sample pre-treatment steps. In the literature, different approaches to determine the CRP concentration in human serum have been presented including a magnetic bead-based agglutination assay [21]- [23], quantum dots and immunofiltration [24], quantum dots and immunochromatography [25],…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%