Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasty with limited open reduction and internal fixation vs open reduction and internal fixation for geriatric acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose Comminuted fractures with poor bone quality in the elderly are associated with poor outcomes. An alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone, primary or acute total hip arthroplasty (aTHA), allows early mobilization with full weight bearing. In this study, we aim to analyze whether treatment of aTHA with/withtout ORIF (limited ORIF) vs ORIF alone yields better intra-operative results, functional outcomes, and less complications. Methods PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals were used. The outcomes of interest were surgery time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, Harris hip score (HHS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), complication rate, surgical site infection rate, heterotopic ossification rate, reoperation rate, and mortality rate. Results Ten observational studies with a total of 642 patients (415 ORIF alone and 227 aTHA with/without ORIF) were included in the systematic review. Compared to ORIF alone, aTHA with limited ORIF provided higher HHS (P = 0.029), better physical function (P = 0.008), better physical component summary (P = 0.001), better mental component summary (P = 0.043) in postoperative 1-year SF-36, lesser complication rate (P = 0.001), and lesser reoperation rate (P = 0.000), but however greater bodily pain (P = 0.001) in acetabular fractured elderlies. Conclusions Acute THA with limited ORIF is favorable alternative to ORIF technique alone. It provided better HHS, physical, and mental component summary in SF-36 and yielded lower complication and reoperation rate compare to ORIF alone.

Management of geriatric acetabular fractures: Contemporary treatment strategies

“…In recent years, acute THA has yielded optimal clinical outcomes. In a recent systematic review that included 642 patients from 10 observational studies, comparing ORIF vs limited ORIF combined with THA, Tu et al [ 23 ] noticed that acute THA was associated with higher hip Harris score (HHS), improved physical function and better SF-36 physical component summary and mental component summary scores after 1-year postoperatively. Moreover, lesser complication and reoperation rates, and greater bodily pain were also recorded.…”

Hounsfield unit values are useful for predicting early outcomes after acetabular fractures: A retrospective study

“…Daurka years were more likely to undergo THA than younger patients [17]. Some reports support performing acute THA for geriatric acetabular fractures [18][19][20][21]. However, the cut-off age that affects postoperative outcomes varies depending on the report.…”