Background
The Cardiac Safety Research Consortium (CSRC) provides both “learning” and blinded “testing” digital ECG datasets from thorough QT (TQT) studies annotated for submission to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to developers of ECG analysis technologies. This manuscript reports the first results from a blinded “testing” dataset that examines Developer re-analysis of original Sponsor-reported core laboratory data.
Methods
11,925 anonymized ECGs including both moxifloxacin and placebo arms of a parallel-group TQT in 191 subjects were blindly analyzed using a novel ECG analysis algorithm applying intelligent automation. Developer measured ECG intervals were submitted to CSRC for unblinding, temporal reconstruction of the TQT exposures, and statistical comparison to core laboratory findings previously submitted to FDA by the pharmaceutical sponsor. Primary comparisons included baseline-adjusted interval measurements, baseline- and placebo-adjusted moxifloxacin QTcF changes (ddQTcF), and associated variability measures.
Results
Developer and Sponsor-reported baseline-adjusted data were similar with average differences less than 1 millisecond (ms) for all intervals. Both Developer and Sponsor-reported data demonstrated assay sensitivity with similar ddQTcF changes. Average within-subject standard deviation for triplicate QTcF measurements was significantly lower for Developer than Sponsor-reported data (5.4 ms and 7.2 ms, respectively; p<0.001).
Conclusion
The virtually automated ECG algorithm used for this analysis produced similar yet less variable TQT results compared to the Sponsor-reported study, without the use of a manual core laboratory. These findings indicate CSRC ECG datasets can be useful for evaluating novel methods and algorithms for determining QT/QTc prolongation by drugs. While the results should not constitute endorsement of specific algorithms by either CSRC or FDA, the value of a public domain digital ECG warehouse to provide prospective, blinded comparisons of ECG technologies applied for QT/QTc measurement is illustrated.