2014
DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of respiratory function during TIVA (romifidine, ketamine, midazolam) and isoflurane anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing ponies Part I: blood gas analysis and cardiorespiratory variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated by Steblaj et al. (), it is unlikely that a significantly different plane of anaesthesia existed in this study. Furthermore, different ketamine‐based TIVA protocols are used in ponies and horses with various drugs and doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As stated by Steblaj et al. (), it is unlikely that a significantly different plane of anaesthesia existed in this study. Furthermore, different ketamine‐based TIVA protocols are used in ponies and horses with various drugs and doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Preparation of the ponies, details of induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, plus instrumentation to measure cardiorespiratory parameters are reported in the companion paper (Steblaj et al. ). Anaesthesia was maintained either with isoflurane (FE′Iso = 1.1%) (Isoflurane, UK) (T‐ISO) or with IV romifidine (120 μg kg −1 per hour), midazolam (0.09 mg kg −1 per hour) and ketamine (3.3 mg kg −1 per hour) in total intravenous anaesthesia (T‐TIVA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the publication “Comparison of respiratory function during TIVA (romifidine, ketamine, midazolam) and isoflurane anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing ponies Part I: blood gas analysis and cardiorespiratory variables.” by Steblaj B, Schauvliege S, Pavlidou K, Gasthuys F, Savvas I, Duchateau L, Kowalczk L, and Moens Y, the last name “Kowalczk” was reported incorrectly (Steblaj et al. ). The correct name should have been Kowalczyk L. This has no influence on the results of the meta‐analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%