2009
DOI: 10.1021/es9008129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in a Particulate Matter Air Quality Model

Abstract: Two efficient methods to study relationships between particulate matter (PM) concentrations and emission sources are compared in the three-dimensional comprehensive air quality model with extensions (CAMx). Particulate source apportionment technology (PSAT) is a tagged species method that apportions concentrations of PM components to their respective primary precursors, e.g., sulfate is apportioned to SOx, nitrate to NOx, etc. The decoupled direct method (DDM) calculates first-order sensitivities of PM concent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, PM sensitivity studies show that the main conclusions do not change with other methods such as source apportionment or direct decoupled sensitivity, if the formation of secondary species is not significant (Koo et al, 2007(Koo et al, , 2009Burr and Zhang, 2011).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PM sensitivity studies show that the main conclusions do not change with other methods such as source apportionment or direct decoupled sensitivity, if the formation of secondary species is not significant (Koo et al, 2007(Koo et al, , 2009Burr and Zhang, 2011).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used in the past to isolate the response of complex, nonlinear systems to one particular sector in source apportionment and sensitivity analysis (Cohan et al, 2005). This method has inherent limitations in accurately describing sensitivities but it may be useful to approximate the effect of potential emission reductions in a particular source or origin area as pointed out before in several studies (Koo et al, 2009;Carmichael and Wild, 2010;Leung et al, 2007).…”
Section: Source Apportionment Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can conduct source apportionment for particulate matter (PM) species, including sulfate, particulate nitrate, ammonium, particulate mercury, secondary organic aerosol, and six categories of primary PM (e.g., elemental carbon, primary organic aerosol, crustal fine, other fine, crustal coarse, and other coarse). The source apportionment can be calculated in parallel to the main program in CAMx for calculating pollutant concentrations, which means that selecting PSAT does not affect the CAMx simulation results (Koo et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Camx Model With Psatmentioning
confidence: 99%