2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of surface-based and image-based quality metrics for the analysis of dimensional computed tomography data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing the resolution by means of the edge spread function does not allow to evaluate resolution along the entire measurement chainand does not directly address the problem of assessing the resolution of the extracted surface. , However, only a small number of methods has been presented in the literature about assessing resolution after the surface determination stage [21][22][23] and resolution in the volumetric dataset already provides some indication of what resolution will be in the final surface. When assessing the resolution in the volumetric dataset using the edge spread function, the reconstruction using detector binning showed the worst resolution out of all test cases, followed by the cases based on 628 projections (the least number of projections) as expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the resolution by means of the edge spread function does not allow to evaluate resolution along the entire measurement chainand does not directly address the problem of assessing the resolution of the extracted surface. , However, only a small number of methods has been presented in the literature about assessing resolution after the surface determination stage [21][22][23] and resolution in the volumetric dataset already provides some indication of what resolution will be in the final surface. When assessing the resolution in the volumetric dataset using the edge spread function, the reconstruction using detector binning showed the worst resolution out of all test cases, followed by the cases based on 628 projections (the least number of projections) as expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Arenhart et al [9] presented a multi-wave standard designed for evaluating the frequency response in extracting surfaces with CT systems and its use to evaluate some factors influencing the structural resolution of CT-based measurements. The use of the multi-wave standard was then extended in order to perform a comparative analysis on the use of image-based and surfacebased metrics to assess the quality of CT-based dimensional data [10].…”
Section: Outcomes Of Bilateral Research Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SNR and CNR have been widely used to quantify, optimise and simulate noise in industrial XCT measurements [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. CNR is suggested as a method of quantifying optimal scan settings in ISO 15708-2 [45].…”
Section: Signal-to-noise and Contrast-to-noise Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%