1992
DOI: 10.1021/ic00039a049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the crystal structures of tris heterocyclic ligand complexes of ruthenium(II)

Abstract: The structures of [Ru(bpy),] (PF6)2 (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) and [ R~( b p m )~] (PF6)2.CH3CN (bpm = 2,2'-bipyrimidine) have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. [R~(bpy)~l(PF,), crystallized in the hexagonal space group P3cl with cell dimensions a = 10.760 (1) A, b = 10.760 (1) A, c = 16.391 (3) A, u = B = 90°, y = 120°, Z = 2, and dal4 = 1.74 g ~m -~, Of the 1411 unique reflections (Mo Ka, l o I 26' I 57O), 1081 reflections with I > a(l) were used in full-matrix least-squares refinement. Final… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
96
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
25
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average Ru À N bond length is 2.058, 2.055 and 2.063 for I, II and III, respectively. These values fall within the same range as those found for [RuA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (bpy) 3 ] 2 + (2.056 ) and related compounds [24] supporting the fact that the protonic states of the ligand do not influence the coordinating properties of the latter to the ruthenium(II) centre. The torsional angle between the imidazole and the phenyl ring is found to be around 17 and 148 for I and II, respectively while it is 38.58 for III.…”
Section: X-ray Structuressupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The average Ru À N bond length is 2.058, 2.055 and 2.063 for I, II and III, respectively. These values fall within the same range as those found for [RuA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (bpy) 3 ] 2 + (2.056 ) and related compounds [24] supporting the fact that the protonic states of the ligand do not influence the coordinating properties of the latter to the ruthenium(II) centre. The torsional angle between the imidazole and the phenyl ring is found to be around 17 and 148 for I and II, respectively while it is 38.58 for III.…”
Section: X-ray Structuressupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Selected distances and bond angles for 1. angles of 78.8(2)°, and the angles between the chelate rings are divided into the usual two groups of 85.9-88.5(2)°and 95.6-99.1(2)°( [15] and to bis(bipyridyl) complexes in general. [16,17] Similarly, the Ru-N bipyridyl bond lengths [2.050-2.078(4) Å] and the benzimidazole bond length [Ru-N(6) = 2.060(4) Å] are very similar to Ru-N bonds in the related complexes. [16,17] The N(6)-C (32) and N(6)-C(26) bond lengths of 1.399(6) and 1.335(5) Å are also similar to the previously reported Ru-benzimidazole complex [1.39(1) and 1.35(1) Å] as are the other N-C bonds within the bipyridyl rings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These Ru-N(bpy) bond distances are similar to those of PF6 salt (2.035(6) -2.074(6)Å, and av. 2.051 Å), 3 and [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)2 (2.056(2)Å), 6 and the remaining Ru1-N5 bond distance (2.0648(19)Å), which is between the Ru1 atom and the N5 atom of the pic ligand, is also similar to the corresponding distance in PF6 salt (2.068(5)Å). The Ru1-O1 bond distance (2.0872(15)Å) is close to that in PF6 salt (2.100(5)Å).…”
Section: Pf6mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…3,4 In the crystal structure, the dihedral angles between two pyridine rings within each 2,2′-bipyridyl ligand (10.3(3) and 14.4(2) ), are significantly larger than that in [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)2 (2.2(1) ). 6 Although a greater twisting of bpy ligands has not been noticed in the literature, 3 we take notice of the greater twisting and the hydrogen-bonding interactions between two oxygen atoms of a pic in a Ru(II) complex cation and 3,3′-protons of a bpy ligand in a neighboring complex cation; Fig. S1 in which the hydrogen-bonding diagram is drawn according to the CIF file of [Ru(pic)(bpy)2](PF6).…”
Section: Nn′)(dmso-s)2]mentioning
confidence: 99%