1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90127-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of Vitremer and Super EBA by implantation into the mandible of rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The search for a restorative material that could be used on exposed root surfaces affected by deep caries or cervical abrasions before surgical coverage has been the subject of various studies 2 . Although amalgam shows less accumulation of microorganisms than CR, 29 it was not included in the present study because of its unfavorable esthetic characteristics, 30 lower fibroblast adhesiveness, 7 and inferior bone biocompatibility 9‐12 compared to resin materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The search for a restorative material that could be used on exposed root surfaces affected by deep caries or cervical abrasions before surgical coverage has been the subject of various studies 2 . Although amalgam shows less accumulation of microorganisms than CR, 29 it was not included in the present study because of its unfavorable esthetic characteristics, 30 lower fibroblast adhesiveness, 7 and inferior bone biocompatibility 9‐12 compared to resin materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental restorative materials have been extensively studied, especially with regard to adhesion, 4 polishing and final finishing, 5,6 biocompatibility, 7‐12 and esthetics 13 . Subgingival restorations may cause alterations because of direct trauma to the periodontal tissues 14 or may facilitate the accumulation of subgingival plaque with consequent inflammatory alterations and/or recession of adjacent gingival tissue 15,16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In implantation studies, material specimens are implanted in the connective tissue [114,115], muscle [116], or into the bone [117] of an animal and an inert material such as silicone rubber serves as negative control. After a period of time the tissue reaction to test and control materials is examined (Figure 3).…”
Section: Local Adverse Reactions and Evaluation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have evaluated in vivo biocompatibility of different dental materials by implantation techniques [114,115,116,117,118,119]. …”
Section: Local Adverse Reactions and Evaluation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O material teste pode ser injetado ou implantado por meio de tubos de teflon, silicone, dentina ou polietileno (TORNECK, 1966;SANGBERG, 1969;BINNIE e MITCHELL, 1973;OLSSON;SLIKOWSKI;LANGLAND, 1981;SAFAVI;PASCON;LANGELAND, 1983;ADRIAN;BANKS, 1985;TAGGER E TAGGER, 1986;ØRSTAVIK e MJÖR, 1988;MAHER et al, 1992;PERTOT et al, 1992;TASSERY et al, 1997;KOLOKURIS et al,1998 A biocompatibilidade de um material é evidenciado pela neoformação óssea e cementária da região afetada (TORABINEJAD et al, 1993;HOLLAND et al, 2001, p.3;HOLLAND et al 2001, p.109 Cox et al (1996), no qual se determina a densidade das células do infiltrado inflamatório da resposta tecidual e necrose para graduar a inflamação. O método utilizado no presente estudo foi baseado no método de Cox com ênfase nas bases histológicas da inflamação.…”
Section: Da Metodologiaunclassified