2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the mouse Embryonic Stem cell Test, the rat Whole Embryo Culture and the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test as alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing of six 1,2,4-triazoles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, metabolites of the two parent compounds did produce adverse effects in the zebrafish assay; the defects produced involved the heart, head, and tail. The results with the triazole compounds will be discussed below [de Jong et al 2011].…”
Section: Zebrafish Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, metabolites of the two parent compounds did produce adverse effects in the zebrafish assay; the defects produced involved the heart, head, and tail. The results with the triazole compounds will be discussed below [de Jong et al 2011].…”
Section: Zebrafish Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent publication compared these three assays to each other and to the results of in vivo tests [de Jong et al 2011]. The authors used the validated rat WEC and mEST protocols along with the zebrafish assay as conducted by Hermsen et al [2011].…”
Section: Assay Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparatively speaking, in vivo tests, based on maternal or embryonic exposure of laboratory animals, are more time-consuming and expensive. In vitro assays, including the whole-embryo culture assay and the micromass assay, offer an alternative to in vivo assessment, although both still rely on embryos (17). Spielmann and Liebsch developed the embryonic stem cell test (EST), an in vitro assay system to determine the teratogenic potential of test chemicals (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%