Comparison of the Root End Sealing Ability of Four Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Teeth with Root Apices Resected at Different Angles – An Invitro Study

Jain, Anurag; Ponnappa, KC; Yadav, Pankaj; Rao, Yogesh; Relhan, Nikhil; Gupta, Priyanka; Choubey, Ashish; Bhardwaj, Shivanshu

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2016/15437.7042

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1,26 In accordance with the previous studies, GIC demonstrated significantly greater microleakage than that by MTA and BD in the present study. 1,2,7,26,27 The difference in the results of these studies may be attributed to several factors, including sample size, angle of apicoectomy, depth of root-end cavity, choice of instruments (i.e., slow or high speed handpieces, sonics, or ultrasonics), type of sectioning, and method of evaluation. 1,9,10,15,28…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In cases where retreatment is not feasible or fails again, endodontic surgery may be necessary to preserve the tooth. 1,2 Endodontic surgery involves resecting a portion of the root apex, preparing retrograde cavity and inserting a suitable retrograde filling material. 3 Conventionally, a retrograde cavity is prepared by small round or inverted conical burs in high-speed micro handpieces.…”

Section: Introducti̇onmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7,8 For an ideal retrograde filling material, there are many new or improved materials that have been introduced in the market, including calcium hydroxide cements, modified zinc oxide eugenol-based cements [Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM), Super-EBA, Rickert], composite resins, different types of glass ionomer cement (GIC), Portland cement, and more recently, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). 2,7,9,10 MTA is well-known and has a good biological compatibility and sealing property. However, a long setting time (170 min) and difficulty in manipulation are some disadvantages of MTA.…”

Section: Introducti̇onmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of Microleakage of Three Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Apical Resection using an AutoCad Program

Erbaşar¹,

Tulumbacı²,

Erbasar³

2018

EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZ GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Endodontik tedaviler yüksek başarı oranına sahip olmakla birlikte, tedavilerin başarısız olduğu ve yenilenmesinin mümkün olmadığı vakalarda dişleri ağızda tutabilmek için cerrahi endodontik işlemler gerekebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada; Cam İyonomer Siman (CİS), Mineral Trioksit Agregate (MTA) ve Biodentine (BD)'in retrograd dolgu materyali olarak apikal sızdırmazlık direncinin in vitro koşullarda karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Çalışmada 70 adet tek köklü daimi insan dişi kök ucundan 3 mm kesildi. Kök ucu kaviteleri ultrasonik uç yardımıyla hazırlandıktan sonra CİS, MTA ve BD ile dolduruldu. Tüm örnekler %2'lik metilen mavisinde 48 saat 37°C'de bekletildi. 1 mm kalınlığındaki kök kesitleri stereomikroskop altında dijital olarak fotoğraflandı. Boya penetrasyon alanı, AutoCad programı kullanılarak metilen mavisi ile boyanan yüzeylerin tüm dentin yüzeyine oranlanması ile hesaplandı. Gruplar arasındaki farklılığı saptayabilmek için Kruskal-Wallis H ve çoklu karşılaştırma (post-hoc) testlerinden yararlanıldı (p<0,05). BULGULAR: Deney gruplarında % 0 ila % 95,45 arasında değişen derecelerde mikrosızıntının olduğu belirlendi. MTA ve BD gruplarının, CİS grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha az sızıntı gösterdiği ancak MTA ve Biodentine grubu arasında sızıntı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadığı saptandı. TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: Bu in vitro çalışmada, retrograd dolgu materyali olarak MTA ve BD'nin apikal sızdırmazlık yeteneğinin CİS'e göre belirgin ölçüde üstün olduğu görülmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Apikal rezeksiyon, apikal mikrosızıntı, mineral trioksit agregat, cam iyonomer siman, biodentine ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Endodontic treatments have a high success rate but endodontic surgery procedures may be necessary to preserve teeth when the treatments are unsuccessful. The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement (GIC), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA),and BiodentineTM (BD) in vitro. METHODS: 70 human single-rooted permanent teeth were resected at 3 mm from the apex. Root-end cavities were prepared using an ultrasonic tip and filled with GIC, MTA, or BD. All specimens were soaked in %2 methylene blue at 37°C for 48 hours. The 1-mm thick roots sections were digitally photographed under a stereomicroscope. With the use of an AutoCad program dye penetration area was calculated as the methylene blue-infiltrated surface divided by total dentin area. The Kruskal-Wallis H test and post-hoc multiple comparison test were used to determine which groups differed from each other (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The experimental groups presented different microleakage values varying between 0% and 95.45%. MTA and BD showed a statistically significant difference in microleakage compared with GIC, but no significant difference was obtained between MTA and BD. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: When used as a retrograde filling material, MTA and BD were significantly superior in terms of apical microleakage compared with GIC.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introducti̇onmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introducti̇onmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of Microleakage of Three Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Apical Resection using an AutoCad Program

Erbaşar¹,

Tulumbacı²,

Erbasar³

2018

EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Faster healing in MTA group can be attributed to the materials sealing ability, high pH, and hard tissue healing stimulation as well as its antimicrobial effect [17–20, 27–30]. In addition, canal wall adaptation of this material was reported to be better than Portland cement, IRM, LC GIC, Super EBA, and amalgam [15, 16, 36]. Thus, MTA may have decreased healing time by preventing the leakage of microorganisms and their products between pulpal space and lesion area.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although IRM was reported to have good sealing ability, studies comparing this material with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) reported that MTA has superior sealing ability when compared to IRM [15, 16]. MTA is a biocompatible material, which was proven to have a great sealing ability and to stimulate healing in hard tissues, and it was shown to be successful in the sealing of root and furcation perforations in many studies [17–20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesions

Arıkan

Sönmez

Sarı

2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The aim of this study was to compare MTA with another base material, IRM, which is generally used on pulpal floor after root canal treatment, regarding their effect on the success of root canal treatment of primary teeth with furcation lesions. Materials and Methods. Fifty primary teeth with furcation lesions were divided into 2 groups. Following root canal treatment, the pulpal floor was coated with MTA in the experimental group and with IRM in the control group. Teeth were followed up considering clinical (pain, pathological mobility, tenderness to percussion and palpation, and any soft tissue pathology and sinus tract) and radiographical (pathological root resorption, reduced size or healing of existing lesion, and absence of new lesions at the interradicular or periapical area) criteria for 18 months. For the statistical analysis, Fisher's exact test and Pearson's chi-square tests were used and a p value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results. Although there were no statistically significant differences between two groups in terms of treatment success, lesions healed significantly faster in the MTA group. Conclusion. In primary teeth with furcation lesions, usage of MTA on the pulpal floor following root canal treatment can be a better alternative since it induced faster healing.

show abstract

Comparison of root end sealing ability of three retrograde filling materials in teeth with root apices resected at 900 using dye penetration method under fluorescent microscope

Chaudhari,

Chandak,

Patel

2023

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The main factor contributing to surgical endodontic dissatisfaction is an inadequate seal at the apex. The material used for retrograde filling should prevent contaminants from penetrating periradicular tissue. So the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Zirconomer and bioactive bone cement to seal the root end as retrograde filling material with apices resected at 900 angles using dye penetration method under fluorescent microscope. Methods: 36 extracted teeth samples were cut at Cementoenamel junction horizontally. Following the customary protocols of, cleaning, shaping and obturation with gutta percha and AH Plus sealer, resection of samples was done 3mm at the apical end at 90 degree angle along the long axis of the tooth with the help of diamond disc. A depth of 3mm of root end cavity was made with diamond coated ultrasonic surgical tip. The samples were randomly allocated in 3 groups: Group I: MTA ; Group II : Zirconomer; Group III: Bioactive Bone Cement . Coating of nail varnish was done with the roots except at the tip. Each material was compacted in the retrocavity using small pluggers. All the retrofilled samples were kept in acridine orange for 24 hours, following which cleaning & bucco-lingual sectioning (vertical) was carried out. Confocal laser scanning fluorescent microscope was used for checking the dye penetration in these samples thereby evaluating sealing ability. Results: Group III (Bioactive Bone Cement) had the highest root end sealing ability with mean (1.4 ± 0.51) followed by Group I (MTA) (2.3 ± 0.65) and lastly Group II (Zirconomer) (4.1 ± 0.57) as root end filling material with apices resected at 900 angle using dye penetration method under fluorescent microscopy which were statistically significant. Conclusions: Bioactive Bone cement can be recommended as an acceptable retrograde filling material.

show abstract

Comparison of the Root End Sealing Ability of Four Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Teeth with Root Apices Resected at Different Angles – An Invitro Study

Cited by 7 publications

References 16 publications

Evaluation of Microleakage of Three Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Apical Resection using an AutoCad Program

Evaluation of Microleakage of Three Different Retrograde Filling Materials in Apical Resection using an AutoCad Program

Comparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesions

Comparison of root end sealing ability of three retrograde filling materials in teeth with root apices resected at 900 using dye penetration method under fluorescent microscope

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About