Comparison of time-domain source-separation techniques for short-pulse distortion-product otoacoustic emissions

Zelle, Dennis; Dalhoff, Ernst; Gummer, Anthony W.

doi:10.1121/1.5016466

Cited by 10 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For measuring TEOAE, in contrast to the recording techniques utilized for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), the acoustic probe must incorporate a means for presenting stimuli [11,12]. To detect TEOAE, signal of the microphone is averaged by time locking it to the transient stimulus.…”

Section: Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (Teoaes)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression in tinnitus sufferers with normal hearing

Elmoazen

Kozou

Elabassiery

2020

Egypt J Otolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The general consensus on the role of hearing loss in generating tinnitus is not relevant in tinnitus patients with normal hearing thresholds. One source of tinnitus may be related to damage to outer hair cells (OHC) of the cochlea. If the OHC of the human cochlea are to be involved in the generation of tinnitus, testing of Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) could provide a reliable means of recording OHC dysfunction. We investigated the role of OHC and cochlear efferent system in tinnitus development in normal hearing ears through studying of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) and Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) amplitudes, contralateral suppression amplitudes and suppression value in 15 normal hearing tinnitus patients and 15 control subjects. Results Mean f2 DPOAE amplitudes and contralateral suppression were significantly lower in tinnitus group compared to controls for all frequencies from 1001 to 6348 Hz. Suppression values of DPOAEs revealed lower but not significant difference between tinnitus and control groups for all frequencies except 1587 and 6348 Hz. TEOAE amplitudes and contralateral suppression were significantly lower in tinnitus groups for all frequencies from 1000 to 4000 Hz compared to the control group. Suppression value of TEOAEs revealed no significant difference between the two groups for all frequencies except 3000 and 4000 Hz were significantly lower in the tinnitus group compared to the control group. Conclusions Normal hearing manifested by pure tone audiometry in non-vascular tinnitus sufferers does not exclude OHC and/or cochlear efferent pathology.

show abstract

Section: Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (Teoaes)mentioning

confidence: 99%