2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of tooth derived hydroxyapatite with commercially pure hydroxyapatite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dentin derived hydroxyapatite (DDHA) is attracting attention as bone graft material and titanium surface coating material for osseointegration, because it contains more osteoinductive component than commercially available HA [4]. In this study, DDHA coating with RF magnetron method was performed on titanium surface and surface characteristics was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentin derived hydroxyapatite (DDHA) is attracting attention as bone graft material and titanium surface coating material for osseointegration, because it contains more osteoinductive component than commercially available HA [4]. In this study, DDHA coating with RF magnetron method was performed on titanium surface and surface characteristics was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dental matrix contains HA and type 1, type 3 and type 5 collagen, and proteins are very similar to alveolar bone as they are both derived from the cells of the neural crest [ 55 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. The hydroxyapatite present in the dental matrix has the same composition of HA as that present in bone, and for this reason, it is similar to the synthetic one [ 99 ]. The osteoconductive properties of tooth-derived materials are widely accepted by several authors [ 96 , 100 , 101 ].…”
Section: Bone Substitutes and Graftmentioning
confidence: 99%