2016
DOI: 10.1111/vru.12461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Transverse Computed Tomographic Excretory Urography Images and Maximum Intensity Projection Images for Diagnosing Ectopic Ureters in Dogs

Abstract: Computed tomographic maximum intensity projection (MIP) images have been shown to improve reader confidence in their diagnoses and to improve detection of vascular structures and pulmonary nodules. The objectives of this method comparison study were to compare transverse source computed tomographic excretory urography (CTEU) images to two, five, and 10 slab thick MIP images for diagnosing canine ectopic ureters, compare reader confidence, and evaluate interobserver agreement. Two board-certified veterinary rad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All examinations were randomized and pseudonymized in a spreadsheet file and a scoring exercise performed at least 1 month after the clinical examination of the cases and performed separately for the CTEU and 4D‐CTEU examinations. To score ureteral topia on both CTEU and 4D‐CTEU, a modified grading system was used independently by two different observers with different levels of experience (ML, a third‐year resident in veterinary diagnostic imaging, and TS, a board‐certified veterinary radiologist): 0, definitely normotopic ureter; 1, probably normotopic ureter; 2, equivocal ureteral topia; 3, probably ectopic ureter; 4, definitively ectopic ureter 14 . Both observers were unaware of the confirmation of diagnosis results at the time of scoring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All examinations were randomized and pseudonymized in a spreadsheet file and a scoring exercise performed at least 1 month after the clinical examination of the cases and performed separately for the CTEU and 4D‐CTEU examinations. To score ureteral topia on both CTEU and 4D‐CTEU, a modified grading system was used independently by two different observers with different levels of experience (ML, a third‐year resident in veterinary diagnostic imaging, and TS, a board‐certified veterinary radiologist): 0, definitely normotopic ureter; 1, probably normotopic ureter; 2, equivocal ureteral topia; 3, probably ectopic ureter; 4, definitively ectopic ureter 14 . Both observers were unaware of the confirmation of diagnosis results at the time of scoring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, murality of the ectopic ureters was scored by the same observers by consensus (ML and TS) during the second session as follows: 0, definitely extramural bridging (coursing extramurally); 1, probably extramural bridging; 2, equivocally intra/extramural; 3, probably intramural tunneling; 4, definitely intramural tunneling; 5, normal exam; 6, nondiagnostic exam for tunneling/bridging determination. If needed, multiplanar maximum intensity projections were used by the reviewers in a combined session with slab thickness of 2‐5 mm as previously reported 13,14 . In all ureters, the UVJ angle was measured on the 4D‐CTEU study on multiplanar reconstructed images at a temporal window displaying the ureter contrast bolus, using the angle tool of the DICOM viewer software by a single author who was experienced in the imaging anatomy and the DICOM viewer software (ML).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations