Comparison of Two Approaches for Measuring Moral Development: Neo-Kohlbergian Approach and Moral Study Challenges

Hooshyari, Zahra; Delavar, Ali; Minaee, Asghar; Eskandari, Hossein

doi:10.29252/nirp.ijpcp.24.1.30

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Kohlberg's theory, people's reasoning and analysis, how to make decisions in ethical situations, paying attention to the level of responsibility and participation of people and justifying their ethical action are the keys to determining moral development (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of a Kohlberg’s theory of moral development-based intervention on ethical reasoning in nurse interns at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and aims: Nursing students represent one of the most important healthcare professionals in the health system that, along with acquiring knowledge and practical skills, should learn professional values and attitudes and nursing care ethics. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an intervention based on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development on the ethical reasoning of nurse interns. Methods: The present quasi-experimental study was conducted with participation of 72 nurse interns in the teaching Ayatollah Kashani and Hajar hospitals affiliated to Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences from 2019 to 2021. The nurse interns were first selected based on the inclusion criteria by census and then randomly assigned to two groups of 36 each, namely, intervention and control. In the intervention group, educational content was performed in four sessions of one and a half hours within one month. Data collection tools included a demographic characteristics checklist and Nursing Dilemma Test (NDT) which was administered at baseline and immediately and one month after the intervention to both groups. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 24 using descriptive and analytical tests such as paired t-test, independent t-test and Fisher’s exact test at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The mean (±standard deviation) score of ethical reasoning before the moral intervention were 39.16±5.74 in the control group and 39.22±1.09 in the intervention group, with no statistically significant difference by independent t test (P=0.831). The mean±standard deviation score of this variable immediately after the moral intervention was obtained 39.08±5.26 in the control group and 39.41±6.58 in the intervention group, with no statistically significant difference by independent t test (P=0.370). But the mean±standard deviation score of ethical reasoning one month after the moral intervention was 38.94±5.68 in the control group and 47.77±6.71 in the intervention group, with a statistically significant difference by independent t test (P=0.001). Conclusion: Given that most nursing students have a low level of ethical reasoning, it is necessary for nursing managers to pay more attention to the issue of professional ethics in educating students in this field. The results of the present study indicated the desirable impact of Kohlberg’s moral intervention on the ethical reasoning of nurse interns, so it is recommended to give serious attention to the use of Kohlberg’s theory of moral development -based interventions in the education of nursing students.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of a Kohlberg’s theory of moral development-based intervention on ethical reasoning in nurse interns at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Foundations of morality in Iran

Atari

Graham

Dehghani

2020

Evolution and Human Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most moral psychology research has been conducted in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. As such, moral judgment, as a psychological phenomenon, might be known to researchers only by its WEIRD manifestations. Here, we start with evaluating Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) using the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, and follow up by building a bottom-up model of moral values, in Iran, a non-WEIRD, Muslim-majority, understudied cultural setting. In six studies (N = 1,945) we examine the structural validity of the Persian translation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, compare moral foundations between Iran and the US, conduct qualitative interviews regarding moral values, expand the nomological network of "Qeirat" as a culture-specific set of moral values, and investigate the pragmatic validity of "Qeirat" in Iranian culture. Our findings suggest an additional moral foundation in Iran, above and beyond the five foundations identified by MFT. Specifically, qualitative studies highlighted the role of "Qeirat" values in Iranian culture, which are comprised of guarding and protectiveness of female kin, romantic partners, broader family, and country. Significant cultural differences in moral values are argued in this work to follow from the psychological systems that, when brought to interact with particular socio-ecological environments, produce different moral structures. This evolutionarily-informed, cross-cultural, mixed-methods research sheds light on moral concerns and their cultural, demographic, and individual-difference correlates in Iran.

show abstract

Comparison of Two Approaches for Measuring Moral Development: Neo-Kohlbergian Approach and Moral Study Challenges

Cited by 2 publications

References 31 publications

The effect of a Kohlberg’s theory of moral development-based intervention on ethical reasoning in nurse interns at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences

The effect of a Kohlberg’s theory of moral development-based intervention on ethical reasoning in nurse interns at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences

Foundations of morality in Iran

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About