Comparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesions

Arıkan, Volkan; Sönmez, Hayriye; Sarı, Şaziye

doi:10.1155/2016/1429286

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, this method allows for precise control of the material to be tested, decreasing the variability in the study compared with other techniques. Furthermore, this method allows for the measurement of the fibrous capsule's thickness, which is a good marker of inflammation , assists in evaluating the biocompatibility of various materials, and is considered a validated method because clinical studies have shown results similar to those previously observed in subcutaneous implantation studies .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

In vivo biocompatibility and biomineralization of calcium silicate cements

Benetti

Gomes‐Filho

Lopes

et al. 2018

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) material has been developed with a modified composition that requires investigations to support its clinical use. This study evaluated the biocompatibility and biomineralization of this new MTA material and compared it with that of two other MTA cements over time. Tubes containing materials (or empty tubes as controls) were inserted into the subcutaneous tissues of 40 rats. On days 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90, the tubes were removed with the surrounding tissues, which were either stained with haematoxylin and eosin or von Kossa for further analyses or unstained for observation under polarized light. On days 7 and 15, moderate inflammation was observed in most specimens, and the fibrous capsule was thick. On day 30, there was mild inflammation in all groups, and the fibrous capsule was thin. On days 60 and 90, there was mild inflammation in the material groups, while the control group showed no inflammation, although no statistically significant difference between the groups was observed and the fibrous capsule was thin. All material groups showed structures that stained with von Kossa and could be observed under polarized light; this was not found for the control. In conclusion, the new MTA material had biocompatibility and biomineralization properties similar to those of the two existing MTA materials.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

In vivo biocompatibility and biomineralization of calcium silicate cements

Benetti

Gomes‐Filho

Lopes

et al. 2018

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, placement of ProRoot MTA on the pulpal floor of primary teeth with furcation radiolucencies was reported to decrease the healing period (Arikan et al . ).…”

Section: Root Fillingmentioning

confidence: 97%

Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a dental material used extensively for vital pulp therapies (VPT), protecting scaffolds during regenerative endodontic procedures, apical barriers in teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices, perforation repairs as well as root canal filling and root-end filling during surgical endodontics. A number of bioactive endodontic cements (BECs) have recently been introduced to the market. Most of these materials have calcium and silicate in their compositions; however, bioactivity is a common property of these cements. These materials include the following: BioAggregate, Biodentine, BioRoot RCS, calciumenriched mixture cement, Endo-CPM, Endocem, EndoSequence, EndoBinder, EndoSeal MTA, iRoot, MicroMega MTA, MTA Bio, MTA Fillapex, MTA Plus, Neo MTA Plus, Ortho MTA, Quick-Set, Retro MTA, Tech Biosealer, and TheraCal LC. It has been claimed that these materials have properties similar to those of MTA but without the drawbacks. In Part I of this review, the available information on the chemical composition of the materials listed above was reviewed and their applications for VPT was discussed. In this article, the clinical applications of MTA and other BECs will be reviewed for apexification, regenerative endodontics, perforation repair, root canal filling, root-end filling, restorative procedures, periodontal defects and treatment of vertical and horizontal root fractures. In addition, the literature regarding the possible drawbacks of these materials following their clinical applications is reviewed. These drawbacks include their discolouration potential, systemic effects and retreatability following use as a root filling material. Based on selected keywords, all publications were searched regarding the use of MTA as well as BECs for the relevant clinical applications. Numerous publications were found regarding the use of BECs for various endodontic applications. The majority of these investigations compared BECs with MTA. Despite promising results for some materials, the number of publications using BECs for various clinical applications was limited. Furthermore, most studies had several methodological shortcomings and low levels of evidence.

show abstract

“…Radiographic characteristics of the root and supporting structures (Arikan, Sonmez, & Sari, ; Pandranki, NR, & Chandrabhatla, ): The extension of radiolucency at the furcation area did not exceed the half of the space between the furcation and the permanent successor No internal root resorption External root resorption (Physiologic or pathologic) limited to apical third and with at least two‐thirds root intact …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Their age ranged from 4 to 6 years. (Arikan, Sonmez, & Sari, 2016;Pandranki, NR, & Chandrabhatla, 2018):…”

Section: Study Subjectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Allium sativum extract as an irrigant in pulpectomy of primary molars: A 12‐month short‐term evaluation

Elheeny

2019

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study indented to assess the clinical and radiographic assessment of Allium sativum extract as an intracanal irrigant for pulpectomy of primary molars. Ninety children with 110 teeth submitted were categorized into two groups. Clinical and radiographic success rates were checked at 3, 6, and 12 months. Qui‐square test at a level of significance was ˂0.05. There was no statistically significant difference ( p ˂ .05) between the two groups that has not been detected clinically or radiographically. Clinical and radiographic success rates of garlic extract at 3 months were (80% and 72.7%), which declined at 6 and 12 months to be 76.4% 6 and 74.5% respectively. For NaOCl group, clinical and radiographic success rates were 87.3% and 85.5% at 3 months, 87.3% and 87.3% at 6 months and 89.1% and 87.3% at 12 months. A . sativum extract can be used efficiently as an irrigant for pulpectomy of primary molar root canals.

show abstract

Comparison of Two Base Materials Regarding Their Effect on Root Canal Treatment Success in Primary Molars with Furcation Lesions

Cited by 11 publications

References 26 publications

In vivo biocompatibility and biomineralization of calcium silicate cements

In vivo biocompatibility and biomineralization of calcium silicate cements

Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview – part II: other clinical applications and complications

Allium sativum extract as an irrigant in pulpectomy of primary molars: A 12‐month short‐term evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About