Comparison of two cable configurations in 3D printed steerable instruments for minimally invasive surgery

Abstract

In laparoscopy, a small incision size improves the surgical outcome but increases at the same time the rigidity of the instrument, with consequent impairment of the surgeon’s maneuverability. Such reduction introduces new challenges, such as the loss of wrist articulation or the impossibility of overcoming obstacles. A possible approach is using multi-steerable cable-driven instruments fully mechanical actuated, which allow great maneuverability while keeping the wound small. In this work, we compared the usability of the two most promising cable configurations in 3D printed multi-steerable instruments: a parallel configuration with all cables running straight from the steerable shaft to the handle; and a multi configuration with straight cables in combination with helical cables. Twelve participants were divided into two groups and asked to orient the instrument shaft and randomly hit six targets following the instructions in a laparoscopic simulator. Each participant carried out four trials (two trials for each instrument) with 12 runs per trial. The average task performance time showed a significant decrease over the first trial for both configurations. The decrease was 48% for the parallel and 41% for the multi configuration. Improvement of task performance times reached a plateau in the second trial with both instruments. The participants filled out a TLX questionnaire after each trial. The questionnaire showed a lower burden score for the parallel compared to multi configuration (23% VS 30%). Even though the task performance time for both configurations was comparable, a final questionnaire showed that 10 out of 12 participants preferred the parallel configuration due to a more intuitive hand movement and the possibility of individually orienting the distal end of the steerable shaft.

Development and mechanical-functional validation of 3D-printed laparoscopic forceps

“…From this perspective, the driving factor behind this technology and what differentiates it from training clamps produced on a large scale is the possibility of customization and adjustments according to each user in all parts, that is, the forceps can adapt to the surgeon hand, length of the training box, diameter of the trocar, among other various combinations 11 , 12 .…”

Towards Precision Ophthalmology: The Role of 3D Printing and Bioprinting in Oculoplastic Surgery, Retinal, Corneal, and Glaucoma Treatment

“…The customizable nature of 3D printing allows for the generation of instruments fitted to the patient and surgeon’s ergonomics. These tailored instruments may greatly improve outcomes and efficiency in minimized invasive surgeries by providing better control and precision, indirectly minimizing surgical errors [ 100 , 101 , 102 ].…”

At The Intersection of Medical Robotic Surgery and Drug Discovery with Quantum Computing

“…So, there is still much uncertainty and a lot to learn along the way as further research, development, and testing of quantum computing technologies at many institutions and organizations around the globe continues [40].…”