2011
DOI: 10.14309/00000434-201110002-00114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Macrolides, Azithromycin and Erythromycin, for Symptomatic Treatment of Gastroparesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Two studies have been reported in abstract form, one of which is preliminary data from the ongoing randomized trial. 11 The second abstract was presented in 2005 and it is unclear whether the patient results reported there overlap with those of the published observational trial from 2010. 12 There is one ongoing randomized controlled trial.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Two studies have been reported in abstract form, one of which is preliminary data from the ongoing randomized trial. 11 The second abstract was presented in 2005 and it is unclear whether the patient results reported there overlap with those of the published observational trial from 2010. 12 There is one ongoing randomized controlled trial.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Since much of the existing work on the use of this agent has been done here at the University of Florida, pharmacists have extensive experience with its use. [2][3][4][5][6] One practical issue that deserves attention is the stability of the oral suspension of azithromycin. This has not been an issue in the inpatient setting, but may be an issue for chronic outpatient use.…”
Section: Comment: Azithromycin For Gastroparesismentioning
confidence: 99%