1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(97)00687-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two sequential extraction procedures for metal fractionation in sediment samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
79
0
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
79
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant proportion of Ni was in the residual fraction, which was in agreement with the literatures (Martin et al, 1998;Mester et al, 1998). High copper content in the residual fraction of river sediments was also found by Budimir and Marko (1995).…”
Section: Cobalt Nickel Copper and Zincsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The dominant proportion of Ni was in the residual fraction, which was in agreement with the literatures (Martin et al, 1998;Mester et al, 1998). High copper content in the residual fraction of river sediments was also found by Budimir and Marko (1995).…”
Section: Cobalt Nickel Copper and Zincsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4). The reason for this behavior, also reported by other authors, 22 can be related to the mentioned characteristics of lead, which can easily be readsorbed, and to its high tendency to form stable complexes with acetate. In fact, because of the lower concentration of acetate in step 1 and the absence of acetic acid in step 2 of the SM&T procedure, lead complexes with acetate are formed to a lesser extent, or are not formed at all.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Two Extraction Proceduressupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The accuracy is satisfying, considering that Cu was also not certified, but only a range of the values is available from the SM&T report, and that our value is in good accordance with that found in the literature using the SM&T scheme on the CRM 601. 22 As regards step 3, even though our procedure is different from the protocol, a comparison of our results (experiments 2 -4) with the certified and indicative values and ranges shows good accordance. Experiment 1, instead, presents considerably lower values: because step 2 of this experiment is too aggressive, it 1276 ANALYTICAL SCIENCES NOVEMBER 2001, VOL.…”
Section: Modified Smandt Proceduressupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transformation and mobility of metals depend on their specific chemical forms or binding formation in sediments. Therefore sequential extraction procedures were used to determine the forms of binding (Tessier et al 1979;Salomons and Forstner 1980;Quevauviller et al 1997) A 3-step sequential extraction proce-dure was applied, using a protocol recommended by the Standard, Measurements and Testing Programme (SM&T), formerly known as the European Communities Bureau of Reference (BCR) (Quevauviller et al 1997;Mester et al 1998;Quevauviller 1998). This protocol uses certified reference material (CRM) 601, which was developed to enable worldwide comparisons of test results from studies of metal-binding forms in sediment columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%