1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1981.tb01278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two subsampling methods for electron microscopic morphometry*

Abstract: SUMMARY The purpose of the present paper is twofold. Firstly, to compare the accuracy per unit cost achieved by two different methods of subsampling micrographs from sections of a material for stereology when the sections cannot be analysed as a whole at the required magnification. Secondly, to illustrate, by means of real data, the application of some of the methods and formulae proposed in the companion paper (Cruz‐Orive & Weibel, 1981) for estimating ratios at the electron microscopic level. The final estim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five of the 10 blocks per left lung were randomly taken, and one technically perfect section per block was viewed in a Philips EM 200. Eight quadrants per section containing lung tissue were photographed by systematic random sampling (24) and recorded on 35-mm film at ϫ1,200 primary magnification. Fields of view containing only air and no tissue were not photographed but were recorded separately and included in the calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of the 10 blocks per left lung were randomly taken, and one technically perfect section per block was viewed in a Philips EM 200. Eight quadrants per section containing lung tissue were photographed by systematic random sampling (24) and recorded on 35-mm film at ϫ1,200 primary magnification. Fields of view containing only air and no tissue were not photographed but were recorded separately and included in the calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A grey level threshold was set for stained collagen, and the area stained was calculated as a percentage of the total area (BioScan, Inc., Edmonds, WA). The sections were sampled in a nonbiased (blinded) systematic fashion ( 11 ). For analysis ofleft and right ventricle interstitial collagen, each ventricle was scanned in entirety on the microscope, and every fifth field was used for analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-five quadrates per section were photographed by systematic random sampling [20] and recorded on 35-mm film. Positive contact copies of film material were viewed in a projec tion unit at a final magnification of x 12,000.…”
Section: Electron-microscopic Morphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%