2015
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of vascular closure devices for access site closure after transfemoral aortic valve implantation

Abstract: Prostar XL-based vascular closure in transfemoral TAVI procedures is associated with higher major vascular complication rates when compared with ProGlide; however, in-hospital mortality is similar with both devices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
127
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
127
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported preference of Prostar XL over Proglide use in Polish centres depends on local practice. Current conflicting reports on the safety of closure device use in TAVI suggest the need for further research in this field [19, 20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported preference of Prostar XL over Proglide use in Polish centres depends on local practice. Current conflicting reports on the safety of closure device use in TAVI suggest the need for further research in this field [19, 20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited and conflicting data from studies comparing the Prostar XL and ProGlide hemostasis devices in the setting of TAVR. 55,56 Vascular closure device failure is not uncommon; its reported incidence is highly variable, ranging from 2.7% to12% and it is an independent predictor of vascular complications. 22,25,57,58 In addition to patient-specific factors cited above, an operator learning curve for device deployment may contribute.…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous TF‐TAVI is a safer and less invasive approach and has become a mainstream treatment strategy in TAVI. The vascular closure device (VCD) is a necessary instrument that is used to achieve haemostasis in TF‐TAVI in this era . There are a few complications peculiar to the use of the Perclose ProGlide® suture‐mediated closure system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA), such as dissection, acute femoral artery stenosis or occlusion, bleeding, and device failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%