2020 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology (MECnIT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/mecnit48290.2020.9166640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison SAW and MOORA Methods with Attribute Weighting Using Rank Order Centroid in Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
9

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, in 2005, the preference ranking organization method for evaluation enrichment (PROMETHEE) appeared, which calculates the dominant flows of alternatives [50,51]. Meanwhile, in 2006, the multi-objective optimization method based on ratio analysis (MOORA) appeared, which evaluates the ranking of each alternative based on ratio analysis [52,53]. The most recent of this group are the combinatorial distance-based evaluation (CODAS) models that use the alternative Euclidean distance of the negative ideal and the Taxicab distance [54,55].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Later, in 2005, the preference ranking organization method for evaluation enrichment (PROMETHEE) appeared, which calculates the dominant flows of alternatives [50,51]. Meanwhile, in 2006, the multi-objective optimization method based on ratio analysis (MOORA) appeared, which evaluates the ranking of each alternative based on ratio analysis [52,53]. The most recent of this group are the combinatorial distance-based evaluation (CODAS) models that use the alternative Euclidean distance of the negative ideal and the Taxicab distance [54,55].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most recent methods of 2017, is the q-rung orthopair (q-ROF) fuzzy set, which is based on IFS and PFN, which presents, in parallel, the degrees of membership, nonmembership, and indeterminacy of decision makers [51,52]. Meanwhile, the T-spherical fuzzy set, from 2019, has the flexibility to unite the sum of the q-th power of membership, abstinence, and non-membership between one and zero [61,62].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Metode Rank Order Centroid dan Additive Ratio Assessment, dilakukan pada objek yang berbeda seperti pemilihan Jaksa Terbaik (Ndruru, 2020), Pemilihan Kepala Lingkungan (Handayani, Syahrizal, & Tampubolon, 2019), Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan (Mesran, Afriany, & Sahir, 2019) dan belum ada untuk rekomendasi supplier. Metode ini melakukan perhitungan bobot menggunakan Rank Order Centroid agar pembobotan terhadap kriteria menjadi lebih baik karena ROC merupakan metode sederhana yang dapat menghasilkan nilai bobot terhadap kriteria yang digunakan (Badaruddin, 2019) menghasilkan kinerja tertinggi dalam dalam hal identifikasi alternatif (Ahn, 2011) serta mengatasi proses pembobotan atribut dalam pengambilan keputusan (Lubis, Sihombing, & Nababan, 2020) dan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment yang secara garis besar banyak melakukan perangkingan dengan cara membandingkan dengan alternative lainnya sehingga mendapatkan hasil yang ideal dan terbaik (Zavadskas & Turskis, 2010;Pratiwi et al, 2019;Supriyanto et al, 2019).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified