1975
DOI: 10.1021/jf60202a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of methods for calculating retentions of nutrients in cooked foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
255
1
7

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
255
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooking yield The cooking yield of the product was determined in accordance with the standard procedure carried out by Murphy et al (1975) and expressed in percentage. The weight of restructured meat blocks were recorded before and after cooking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooking yield The cooking yield of the product was determined in accordance with the standard procedure carried out by Murphy et al (1975) and expressed in percentage. The weight of restructured meat blocks were recorded before and after cooking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of total carotenoids was obtained by summing the values for all of the quantified fractions, including the total lutein, zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, α-carotene and β-carotene fractions, as described by Murphy, Criner and Gray (1975).…”
Section: Determination Of the Carotenoid Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of carotenoids with provitamin A activity (proVA) was obtained using the following formula: total β-carotene + ½ total α-carotene + ½ total β-cryptoxanthin (mg/g), as described by Murphy, Criner and Gray (1975). The apparent percentage of retention percentage for each variable was calculated using the formula proposed by Murphy, Criner and Gray (1975).…”
Section: Determination Of the Carotenoid Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao final, o resíduo sólido resultante foi recuperado por centrifugação (12.000 × g/10 minutos). A retenção efetiva levou em conta a perda de sólidos, por solubilização de minerais e proteínas (sarcoplasmáticas) e arraste de lípides, de acordo com Murphy, Criner e Gray (1975). A perda de sólidos considerada foi de 28,46 g.100 g -1 , em matéria seca, sendo 6,10 g em minerais, 19,41 g em proteínas (correspondente a 25% da proteína total, segundo HAARD, 1995) e 2,95 g em lípides.…”
Section: Retenção Do Selêniounclassified
“…A retenção aparente de micro e macronutrientes é maior que a real em alimentos cujos processamentos levam à perda de sólidos, implicando, necessariamente, que se conheça a perda de massa para então ser estabelecida a retenção efetiva (MURPHY;CRINER;GRAY, 1975). Desta forma foi constatada uma retenção efetiva de 68,81%, considerada quantitativamente expressiva, podendo ser empregada como um valor mínimo em propósitos práticos, mesmo que subestimada.…”
Section: Selêniounclassified