2015
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2014.2364026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensating the PTR and LPF Features of the HY-2A Satellite Altimeter Utilizing Look-Up Tables

Abstract: The point target response (PTR) and low-pass filter (LPF) features of the altimeter (ALT) onboard China's HY-2A satellite are presented and analyzed. Via Monte-Carlo simulation, the look-up tables (LUTs) of the range (epoch), significant wave height (SWH), and backscatter (Sigma0) biases with respect to SWH and attitude angle (ATT) are calculated accounting for the instrument PTR and LPF features using two distinct retracking algorithms (MLE3 and MLE4). The performance of both retracking algorithms are also ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that this is not caused by the lookup table optimization algorithm, but by the error introduced by approximating the actual sinc(•) point target response function with a Gaussian function in the parabolic cylinder model. It should be noted that this approximation strategy is not only present in the parabolic cylinder model, but also adopted by many SAR processing models, indicating that it is a common issue [29]. Figure 8 shows the influence of Significant Wave Height (SWH) and off-nadir angle on the shape of the backscattering model.…”
Section: Parabolic Cylinder Model and Its Accelerated Version Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that this is not caused by the lookup table optimization algorithm, but by the error introduced by approximating the actual sinc(•) point target response function with a Gaussian function in the parabolic cylinder model. It should be noted that this approximation strategy is not only present in the parabolic cylinder model, but also adopted by many SAR processing models, indicating that it is a common issue [29]. Figure 8 shows the influence of Significant Wave Height (SWH) and off-nadir angle on the shape of the backscattering model.…”
Section: Parabolic Cylinder Model and Its Accelerated Version Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where T is the onboard tracking range, E is the retracked offset (with time dimension), "c/2 (c being the light velocity)" is the scaling factor from time to range, D is the Doppler correction, M is the instrument imperfection bias [38,39], and 0.180 is a bias (in meters) due to wrong altimeter antenna reference point [40].…”
Section: Altimetry Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%