2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11149-012-9205-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition enhancing regulation and diffusion of innovation: the case of broadband networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the percentage of exchanges with LLU enabled also had a positive impact (0.02), but overall the results contrast with the findings of Gruber & Koutroumpis (2013). Their analysis found that diffusion and investment has taken place from intra-platform competition and less so from inter-platform competition, but it might be that the UK does not follow the same trend.…”
Section: Fixed Broadband Modelmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the percentage of exchanges with LLU enabled also had a positive impact (0.02), but overall the results contrast with the findings of Gruber & Koutroumpis (2013). Their analysis found that diffusion and investment has taken place from intra-platform competition and less so from inter-platform competition, but it might be that the UK does not follow the same trend.…”
Section: Fixed Broadband Modelmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This implies there is a high degree of interdependency between ICT infrastructure supply and demand. In contrast, Gruber & Koutroumpis (2013) found little evidence globally, across 167 broadband markets, that inter-platform competition across technologies (e.g. cable) accelerated broadband diffusion, instead pointing to the benefits of inter-firm and intra-platform competition on the incumbent's Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) platform.…”
Section: Fixed and Mobile Ict Infrastructure In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LLU has been found to increase Internet adoption by increasing provision and lowering prices (see, e.g. Bauer, Berne, & Maitland, 2002;Grosso, 2006;Gruber & Koutroumpis, 2013;Lee, Marcu, & Lee, 2011).…”
Section: Telecommunications Reforms and Internet Use In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde que el incremento de la penetración y uso de Internet fueron adoptados por consenso como imperativo global de los gobiernos, corporaciones del sector privado, y sociedad civil, en el marco de la Cumbre Mundial de la Sociedad de la Información en 2003, numerosos lineamientos de acción pública han sido formulados, entre los cuales se destacan aquellos dirigidos al fomento del despliegue de infraestructura, estímulos a la demanda, y asequibilidad del servicio. Las medidas diseñadas para mejorar las condiciones de acceso a la conectividad agrupan, comúnmente, las políticas de regulación que buscan fortalecer la competencia [6]; aumentar la eficiencia en el mercado de las telecomunicaciones a través del uso compartido de infraestructura [7]; afianzar un entorno propicio para la inversión privada mediante garantías de trato no discriminatorio entre proveedores, con base en principios de neutralidad tecnológica [8]; establecer un régimen de asignación de espectro transparente y predecible para favorecer la innovación [9]; e incluir en los procesos de asignación de licencias para uso de espectro, obligaciones específicas de cobertura, como alternativa para llevar a oferta a regiones que despiertan poco interés comercial [10]. La inversión pública, acompañada de medidas regulatorias para facilitar el acceso abierto a redes de backbone y backhaul, es otra práctica tendiente a reducir las barreras a la entrada de nuevos operadores [11].…”
Section: Referentes De Análisisunclassified