2017
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16070847
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary Features of Attention Bias Modification Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders

Abstract: The study provides evidence of enhanced clinical effects for patients receiving active ABMT. Moreover, ABMT appears to be most effective for patients with abnormal amygdala-insula connectivity. ABMT may target specific threat processes associated with dysfunctional amygdala-insula connectivity that are not targeted by CBT alone. This may explain the observation of enhanced clinical response to CBT plus active ABMT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
88
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific inclusion/exclusion criteria for each site, as well as additional information, are detailed in the supplementary material. Some of the sites have previously published the attention bias and anxiety severity data for some of their respective participants as pre-treatment mean threat bias and anxiety scores, and as correlations between these two measures (de Voogd et al, 2016; Fitzgerald, Rawdon, & Dooley, 2016; Morales, Taber-Thomas, & Pérez-Edgar, 2017; White, Britton et al, 2016; White, Sequeira et al, 2017). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific inclusion/exclusion criteria for each site, as well as additional information, are detailed in the supplementary material. Some of the sites have previously published the attention bias and anxiety severity data for some of their respective participants as pre-treatment mean threat bias and anxiety scores, and as correlations between these two measures (de Voogd et al, 2016; Fitzgerald, Rawdon, & Dooley, 2016; Morales, Taber-Thomas, & Pérez-Edgar, 2017; White, Britton et al, 2016; White, Sequeira et al, 2017). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to demonstrate mediation of symptom changes by attention bias changes using reaction time (RT) measures yielded mixed results, possibly due to low reliability of RT‐based bias scores (Price et al., ; Schmukle, ; White et al., ) or lack of statistical power (but see Price et al., ). Data on change in neural activity pre‐to‐post ABM may provide more sensitive markers of mediation as these markers relate to mechanisms of symptom changes (Britton et al., ; Browning, Holmes, Murphy, Goodwin, & Harmer, ; Eldar & Bar‐Haim, ; Nelson, Jackson, Amir, & Hajcak, ; White et al., , ). Nevertheless, while informative, such designs do not quantify online changes in cognitive processes, which could be highly relevant to these mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in neural activity pre-to-post ABM may provide more sensitive markers of mediation as these markers relate to mechanisms of symptom changes (Britton et al, 2015;Browning, Holmes, Murphy, Goodwin, & Harmer, 2010;Eldar & Bar-Haim, 2010;Nelson, Jackson, Amir, & Hajcak, 2017;White et al, 2016White et al, , 2017. Nevertheless, while informative, such designs do not quantify online changes in cognitive processes, which could be highly relevant to these mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, CBGT explicitly teaches patients to change their attention and behavior through instruction and practice. Based on these differences, prior work suggests that CBGT and ABM could complement each other by targeting different aspects of anxiety (Barry et al 2015; White et al 2017). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This design could have potentially offset attentional training effects that may have been achieved with active ABM practiced at home. Finally, Rapee et al (2013) applied social threat words as ABM stimuli, whereas the more common ABM stimuli used for SAD are threat-related faces (Riemann et al 2013; Shechner et al 2014; Heeren et al 2015; White et al 2017). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%