2018
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aaa206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete mechanical behavior analysis of FG Nano Beam under non-uniform loading using non-local theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…iPSC derivation and differentiation is a multi-step processes and experimental procedure variations can produce different outcomes ( Popp et al, 2018 ). Often, the impact of variation can overpower any biological differences, especially where sample sizes are small ( Ghaffari et al, 2018 ). Studies have also confirmed that the individual donor’s genetic background and differences in differentiation protocols might significantly influence the methylation landscape, affecting pluripotency between iPSCs from different donors ( de Boni et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Modeling Rtt Using Brain Organoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPSC derivation and differentiation is a multi-step processes and experimental procedure variations can produce different outcomes ( Popp et al, 2018 ). Often, the impact of variation can overpower any biological differences, especially where sample sizes are small ( Ghaffari et al, 2018 ). Studies have also confirmed that the individual donor’s genetic background and differences in differentiation protocols might significantly influence the methylation landscape, affecting pluripotency between iPSCs from different donors ( de Boni et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Modeling Rtt Using Brain Organoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recapitulates that at the IPSC stage, there are very few molecular differences between RTT and isogenic controls and that gene expression patterns can vary greatly among the different samples especially with a small sample size (e.g., [17,27,41]). Some of these differences are hypothesised to stem from the technical variability arisen in iPSC derivation and the methodology of cell differentiation [42,43]. It is important to note therefore that even with powerful gene-network based analysis, subtle molecular changes in undifferentiated cells can be eclipsed by limitations of the model and technique.…”
Section: Limitations Of Study Design and Mutation Type For Constructing Co-expression Network And Module Enrichment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It equals to 5/6 in the static state (Ghannad et al, 2013). According to the principle of virtual work, the energy changes in the electromechanical potential of the structure are equal to the changes of work caused by the external electromechanical forces applied to the structure ( δ W = δ U ) (Benjeddou, 2000; Benjeddou and Andrianarison, 2005; Ghaffari et al, 2018), where U is the electromechanical potential energy of the whole body and W denotes the whole work due to the applied pressure and electric flux on the inner and outer surfaces of the cylinder. The electromechanical potential energy of the whole body and the work resulting from these applied forces are calculated as (Benjeddou, 2000; Benjeddou and Andrianarison, 2005)…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%