Complexity in a Monopoly Market with a General Demand and Quadratic Cost Function

Sarafopoulos, Georges

doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00014-3

Cited by 10 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some monopolistic suppliers strongly maintain their available position in the market and react harshly enough if they are accused of exploiting the situation for their own benefit (Mirman et al 2014;Braido, Shalders 2015;Sarafopoulos 2015). The antitrust legislation is in US, Europe, Australia, Lithuania, which intends to regulate markets and prevent the abuse of a dominant market position.…”

Section: Supplier's Reputationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The distortion of market competition conditions and circumstances, examined the following scientists: monopsony cases - Dassiou and Glycopantis (2008);OECD (2008);Matsudaira (2014);Danziger (2010); Bonanno and Lopez (2012); Barr and Roy (2008);Brennan (2011);Melnikas and Smaliukienė (2007); Strobl and Walsh (2007); monopoly cases -Mirman et al (2014);Rogers 2013;Braido and Shalders (2015); Sarafopoulos (2015); Jablanovic (2013); Willington and Ning (2014); Mumuni et al (2016); Lai et al (2016);Mendoza (2016); Matsumoto and Szidarovszky (2015); Kováč and Žigić (2016);Shin (2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Or the consensus is made on which undertaking will win a particular contract. Symptoms of such agreements are (Sarafopoulos 2015;Rogers 2013;Willington, Ning 2014):…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There may be agreements, when suppliers submit proposals, but provide by common contractor agreements, knowing the lowest bidding threshold, the system of discounts or price levels. More the buyer is predictable, the easier it is for suppliers to manipulate in determining who will win (Braido, Shalders 2015;Sarafopoulos 2015;Rogers 2013;Willington, Ning 2014):…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This may include following products, services or projects (Braido, Shalders 2015;Sarafopoulos 2015;Rogers 2013;Willington, Ning 2014):…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

International Business Negotiations: Search of the Balance and the Equilibrium of Negotiating Powers, under Distorting Market Conditions of Competition (Monopsony, Oligopsony and Monopoly Cases)

Peleckis

Peleckienė

2017

Proceedings of 5th International Scientific Conference Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education ‘2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Certain challenges arise in business negotiations when competition in the market is more or less distorted. This can take place in various markets conditions. In such situations great possibilities open up to the development of international business relations as overclocking new market participants can provide additional alternatives for companies and organizations or other business units, by reducing the negative impact of competition distortions for the balance of negotiating power of participants in negotiations. In the development and implementation of effective international business negotiation strategy, it is important to identify the balance of negotiating power of major participants in negotiations in order to make more efficient use of the potential of business negotiations -the negotiating powers. The aim of this article is to analyze in complex the unfolding theory and practice of development and implementation of international business negotiations and negotiating strategies under distorting market competition conditions, to reveal opportunities on development and implementing improvements of these strategies in cases of monopsony, oligopsony and monopoly. Object of the research is the search of balance on negotiating powers in international business negotiations under conditions of distorted competition in the market. The scientific problem -negotiation theory lacks measures for assessment and balancing the negotiating powers of negotiation's participants under distorted market competition.

show abstract

Section: Supplier's Reputationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Or the consensus is made on which undertaking will win a particular contract. Symptoms of such agreements are (Sarafopoulos 2015;Rogers 2013;Willington, Ning 2014):…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This may include following products, services or projects (Braido, Shalders 2015;Sarafopoulos 2015;Rogers 2013;Willington, Ning 2014):…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

International Business Negotiations: Search of the Balance and the Equilibrium of Negotiating Powers, under Distorting Market Conditions of Competition (Monopsony, Oligopsony and Monopoly Cases)

Peleckis

Peleckienė

2017

Proceedings of 5th International Scientific Conference Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education ‘2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Uncertain retailer-led supply chain contract design under asymmetric delivery reliability information: sequential ordering and pricing decisions

Yang

Shang

et al. 2023

J Ambient Intell Human Comput

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stability and dynamic behaviors of a limited monopoly with a gradient adjustment mechanism

Liu

2023

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complexity in a Monopoly Market with a General Demand and Quadratic Cost Function

Cited by 10 publications

References 10 publications

International Business Negotiations: Search of the Balance and the Equilibrium of Negotiating Powers, under Distorting Market Conditions of Competition (Monopsony, Oligopsony and Monopoly Cases)

International Business Negotiations: Search of the Balance and the Equilibrium of Negotiating Powers, under Distorting Market Conditions of Competition (Monopsony, Oligopsony and Monopoly Cases)

Uncertain retailer-led supply chain contract design under asymmetric delivery reliability information: sequential ordering and pricing decisions

Stability and dynamic behaviors of a limited monopoly with a gradient adjustment mechanism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About