2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications Related to the Initial Trocar Insertion of 3 Different Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some systematic review compared different laparoscopic entry techniques. 10,15,16 One of them evaluated 57 randomized controlled trials, including 25 techniques (as direct vision entry, open entry Evidence and Veress needle entry techniques) and concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the use of one laparoscopic entry technique over another. 10 Another Japanese systematic review highlighted 17 studies and also did not reported any difference when comparing major complications (major vessel injury, gastrointestinal injury, and solid organ injury) 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some systematic review compared different laparoscopic entry techniques. 10,15,16 One of them evaluated 57 randomized controlled trials, including 25 techniques (as direct vision entry, open entry Evidence and Veress needle entry techniques) and concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support the use of one laparoscopic entry technique over another. 10 Another Japanese systematic review highlighted 17 studies and also did not reported any difference when comparing major complications (major vessel injury, gastrointestinal injury, and solid organ injury) 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iatrogenic aortic injury is generally repaired by simple direct suture or by endovascular technique by stent grafting. 6,7 However, in this patient, the defect size was large and was not suitable for direct repair since it involved loss of more than 2/3rd of circumference, a woven interposition graft was used. We did not have the facilities for endovascular repair in our setup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5 A recent meta-analysis concluded that DTI causes fewer major vascular injuries when compared with other two techniques; however, the difference was statistically not significant. 6 In this case, DTI was employed; however, it was with an optical trocar which theoretically should reduce further the incidence of major vascular injury. Lack of experience of surgeon, use of too much force, U-shaped vigorous motion technique, thin linea alba, abnormal angulation, and inappropriate length of trocar are all the risk factors for injuring a major vessel while inserting a primary trocar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, in 2019, a large meta-analysis concluded that although major complications were extremely rare with any method of primary trocar entry, in terms of minor complications, DTI was the safest method. 16 The technique of DTI as described in the methodology is followed in all cases in order to standardize the technique and minimize any variations that might increase the likelihood of injury. This becomes more relevant in any training institute where the risks of complications are inherently increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%