2021
DOI: 10.1111/jne.13001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositional variation in early‐life parenting structures alters oxytocin and vasopressin 1a receptor development in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)

Abstract: Paternal absence can significantly alter bio‐behavioural development in many biparental species. This effect has generally been demonstrated by comparing the development of offspring reared under biparental care with those reared by a single mother. However, studies employing this design conflate two significant modifications to early‐life experience: removal of father‐specific qualities and the general reduction of offspring‐directed care. In the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Females and males exhibit similar parental behaviors, but they display these behaviors to different degrees across pup development and across subsequent litters 8–10 . By “trading off” duties, prairie vole parents can provide more active care for their pups, which promotes the pups' physiological and behavioral development 11–13 . However, whether reliable intra‐pair sex differences and organized partner‐directed behavior emerge as a function of relationship formation and maturation remains unexamined, especially as the vast majority of studies focus on only one member of a pair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females and males exhibit similar parental behaviors, but they display these behaviors to different degrees across pup development and across subsequent litters 8–10 . By “trading off” duties, prairie vole parents can provide more active care for their pups, which promotes the pups' physiological and behavioral development 11–13 . However, whether reliable intra‐pair sex differences and organized partner‐directed behavior emerge as a function of relationship formation and maturation remains unexamined, especially as the vast majority of studies focus on only one member of a pair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in mandarin voles, which are also socially monogamous, have shown that PD decreases the number of OT neurons originating from the PVN and projecting to the medial prefrontal cortex in females [ 101 ], while PD male mandarin voles have more AVP-immunoreactive PVN neurons and fewer AVP-immunoreactive neurons in the anterior hypothalamus and fewer OT-immunoreactive neurons in the PVN [ 102 ]. In PD prairie voles, female OTR mRNA expression is lower in the medial amygdala and nucleus accumbens [ 103 ] while AVPR1a density is higher in the medial amygdala [ 76 ], which is consistent with reduced partner preference and higher anxiety. In male prairie voles, PD was shown to reduce OTR density in the central amygdala [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In PD prairie voles, female OTR mRNA expression is lower in the medial amygdala and nucleus accumbens [ 103 ] while AVPR1a density is higher in the medial amygdala [ 76 ], which is consistent with reduced partner preference and higher anxiety. In male prairie voles, PD was shown to reduce OTR density in the central amygdala [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 125I-OVTA binding was quantified directly (measured as optical binding density, OBD) from the film using a light box, a top mounted camera, and the MCID Core Digital Densitometry system (Cambridge, UK) according to methods previously described (Rogers et al, 2021). Values for OBD from a set of 125l autoradiography standards (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) were loaded into MCID in order to generate a standard curve, from which 5 OBD values for each ROI were extrapolated (Oxtr 4 and Oxtr 5 ).…”
Section: Star Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%