2022
DOI: 10.1002/stco.202100051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression tests on large angle columns in high‐strength steel

Abstract: The paper addresses the instability of large angle columns in high-strength steel subjected to compression loads. It presents a number of compression tests on such columns with different eccentricities and slenderness and the resulting different buckling failure modes observed. The experimental campaign is intended to widen our understanding of the behaviour of highstrength steel columns with large angle sections in compression and bending and so to complement previous experimental studies. The tests were acco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the results show that the values of 𝑟 𝑁 obtained from AISC 360 are in unsafe-side for values of 𝜆 v ̅̅̅ ranging from 1.0 to 2.0. Regarding the eccentrically loaded compression angles connected by one bolt, the prescriptions from EN 1993-3-1/prEN 1993-1-1 and ANGELHY project [18] demonstrated, in general, reasonable agreement with the numerical values, although the values of 𝑟 𝑁 for low slenderness ratio are in the unsafe-side.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the results show that the values of 𝑟 𝑁 obtained from AISC 360 are in unsafe-side for values of 𝜆 v ̅̅̅ ranging from 1.0 to 2.0. Regarding the eccentrically loaded compression angles connected by one bolt, the prescriptions from EN 1993-3-1/prEN 1993-1-1 and ANGELHY project [18] demonstrated, in general, reasonable agreement with the numerical values, although the values of 𝑟 𝑁 for low slenderness ratio are in the unsafe-side.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, this work intends to assess the design prescriptions of EN 1993-1-1, EN 1993-3-1, FprEN 1993-1-1, prEN 1993-3 and AISC 360 for steel angles in concentric and eccentric compression and connected at one leg by one and two bolts, as well as the methods proposed by the ANGELHY project [18]. An extensive numerical study was proposed, in which various parameters such as slenderness, cross-sections (small and large angles), and steel grade (conventional and high strength steel) were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this was corrected, and the corrected curves are illustrated in both figures. More details about the correction can be found in [9]. For all centrally loaded tests, the deflections along the weak axis increased significantly with the load until failure be reached by weak axis buckling.…”
Section: Results Of the Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the tests are presented below through graphs and tables. All the results (initial imperfections, deflections, strains, twists) can be found in [9]. Numerical simulations of the experimental tests with FINELG have been performed, by taking into account the actual dimensions, lengths, imperfections and material properties.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. More information on the tests and the related analyses is provided in [14]. Further on, design formulae were developed for checking equal leg angle section members, applicable for class 2 to 4 cross-sections.…”
Section: Single Angle Steel Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%