2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07902.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets

Abstract: The overwhelming majority of research in the neurosciences employs P-values stemming from tests of statistical significance to decide on the presence or absence of an effect of some treatment variable. Although a continuous variable, the P-value is commonly used to reach a dichotomous decision about the presence of an effect around an arbitrary criterion of 0.05. This analysis strategy is widely used, but has been heavily criticized in the past decades. To counter frequent misinterpretations of P-values, it ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
334
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(340 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
334
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The p-values were corrected using the False Discovery Rate (FDR), through the Benjamini and Hochberg linear-step up procedure, when there are multiple comparisons problems. Additionally, the effect size was computed, using the Matlab toolbox provided by Hentschke and Stüttgen [53], in different comparisons. For correlation analysis between clinical scales and neurophysiology, the Spearman rank order correlation was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p-values were corrected using the False Discovery Rate (FDR), through the Benjamini and Hochberg linear-step up procedure, when there are multiple comparisons problems. Additionally, the effect size was computed, using the Matlab toolbox provided by Hentschke and Stüttgen [53], in different comparisons. For correlation analysis between clinical scales and neurophysiology, the Spearman rank order correlation was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percent-explained variance (o 2 ) reflects how much of the variance in a neuron's firing rates can be explained by the individual factors. The percent-explained variance for two factors was calculated using the MATLAB effect size measures toolbox 55 in a 300 ms-sliding window, advanced in steps of 20 ms. All statistical tests were carried out in MATLAB or R.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of d =0.2 to 0.3 shows a small effect size, d ≥ 0.5 shows medium effect size and a value of d ≥ 0.8 shows large effect size [30]. The effect size for a feature is a more reliable measure for classification and it complements the p value statistics when sample size changes [31]. All statistical calculations were carried out using the Statistical toolbox in MATLAB R2012b.…”
Section: E Roc and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%