Computation on Information, Meaning and Representations. An Evolutionary Approach

Abstract

Understanding computation as "a process of the dynamic change of information" brings to look at the different types of computation and information. Computation of information does not exist alone by itself but is to be considered as part of a system that uses it for some given purpose. Information can be meaningless like a thunderstorm noise, it can be meaningful like an alert signal, or like the representation of a desired food. A thunderstorm noise participates to the generation of meaningful information about coming rain. An alert signal has a meaning as allowing a safety constraint to be satisfied. The representation of a desired food participates to the satisfaction of some metabolic constraints for the organism. Computations on information and representations will be different in nature and in complexity as the systems that link them have different constraints to satisfy. Animals have survival constraints to satisfy. Humans have many specific constraints coming in addition. And computers will compute what the designer and programmer ask for. We propose to analyze the different relations between information, meaning and representation by taking an evolutionary approach on the systems that link them. Such a bottom-up approach allows starting with simple organisms and avoids an implicit focus on humans, which is the Information and Computation 2 most complex and difficult case. To make available a common background for the many different cases, we use a systemic tool that defines the generation of meaningful information by and for a system submitted to a constraint [Menant, 2003]. This systemic tool allows to position information, meaning and representations for systems relatively to environmental entities in an evolutionary perspective. We begin by positioning the notions of information, meaning and representation and recall the characteristics of the Meaning Generator System (MGS) that link a system submitted to a constraint to its environment. We then use the MGS for animals and highlight the network nature of the interrelated meanings about an entity of the environment. This brings us to define the representation of an item for an agent as being the network of meanings relative to the item for the agent. Such meaningful representations embed the agents in their environments and are far from the Good Old Fashion Artificial Intelligence type ones. The MGS approach is then used for humans with a limitation coming from the unknown nature of human consciousness. Application of the MGS to artificial systems brings to look for compatibilities with different levels of Artificial Intelligence (AI) like embodied-situated AI, the Guidance Theory of Representations, and enactive AI. Concerns relative to different types of autonomy and organic or artificial constraints are highlighted. We finish by summarizing the points addressed and by proposing some continuations. A.1 Information and meaning. Meaning generation. A.1.1 Information. Meaning of information and quantity of information Information, meanings and represent...

Artificial Intelligence Inheriting the Historical Crisis in Psychology: An Epistemological and Methodological Investigation of Challenges and Alternatives

“…From a similar (but away from CHAT) position, Menant (2011 , 2020) maintained that, by seeking satisfaction, internal constraints (needs) generate useful meanings by receiving information from the environment (the agent in action). These meanings ground the agent in the environment through directed actions taken to modify the environment, resulting in the functional production of knowledge and allowing perception to be realized ( Menant, 2015 ). Additionally, for Frankl (1992 , 2014) , adaptation is a process of meaning generation through the meaning generator system (MGS).…”

Information, Constraint and Meaning from Pre-Biotic World to a Possible Post-Human One. An Evolutionary Approach

“…Regarding artificial agents, the meaning generation is based on derived constraints satisfaction. The MGS can also be used with semiotics when compared to a simplified version of the Peircean Interpreter [1].…”

“…Putting aside metaphysical hypothesis most of us would agree that meanings are generated by agents for given purposes, for specific constraints to be satisfied. As already presented, constraints for animals can be characterized by 'stay alive' and 'live group life', and the ones for artificial agents by 'as programmed by designer' [1]. Constraints for humans are more difficult to identify because the nature of human mind is not clearly understood and also because constraints can be unconscious.…”

“…When the MGS receives information having a connection with the constraint it generates meaningful information that will be used by the agent to implement an action aimed a satisfying the constraint [2]. Some first results have been presented in an evolutionary background [1,3] and also for artificial agents [4]. These results have provided a first coverage of the life-human segment in terms of meaning generation for internal constraint satisfaction.…”

Composite Agency: Semiotics of Modularity and Guiding Interactions

“…They have no purposes, and thus, they do not perform functions. The theory of meaning generation via satisfaction of constraints (Menant 2011) has a similar problem: constraints can be defined for crystals, fires, and tornadoes, but these constraints did not appear via evolution or learning. Functions, meaning, and agency exist only in evolving or learning systems that are recurrently produced either phylogenetically, or ontogenetically, or collectively (Rodríguez 2016).…”