2014
DOI: 10.1515/9783110288384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Approaches to the Study of Movement in Archaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But it would also inevitably result in more specific, less transferable assumptions and interpretations. An excessive amount of detail in the computation of LCPs might even result in less realism, since this would assume a level of planning perfection that might not have been achievable by prehistoric (or even current) societies (this point is raised by Verhagen et al, 2014). And then there is also the matter of a multitude of social factors, not easily representable in a cost surface, that might have prevented optimal network links from being established in the first place (modern transportation networks certainly are a compromise between what should be done and what can be done, taking into consideration political, judicial and economic constraints), which add to our conviction that overoptimisation of models can actually have a negative impact on their realism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But it would also inevitably result in more specific, less transferable assumptions and interpretations. An excessive amount of detail in the computation of LCPs might even result in less realism, since this would assume a level of planning perfection that might not have been achievable by prehistoric (or even current) societies (this point is raised by Verhagen et al, 2014). And then there is also the matter of a multitude of social factors, not easily representable in a cost surface, that might have prevented optimal network links from being established in the first place (modern transportation networks certainly are a compromise between what should be done and what can be done, taking into consideration political, judicial and economic constraints), which add to our conviction that overoptimisation of models can actually have a negative impact on their realism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White and Barber (2012) show that it is possible to locate previously unknown sites at crossing points, given solely a realistic set of LCPs; Fonte et al (2017) identify additional historic sites at points of LCP convergence (they refer to them as points of "divergence", but in an isotropic model, this is synonymous). The study by Verhagen et al (2014) considers junction points as candidates for new network nodes and explores their role as means of further link optimisation (so-called Fig. 7 A completely connected network (upper left) and its maximum distance derivations, with links modelled as least-cost paths (compare with Fig.…”
Section: Least-cost Paths and Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of such reconstructions for archaeological research has become more prominent in the Netherlands in recent years, also outside the 'Finding the limits of the limes' project (e.g. Pierik 2017;Van Lanen 2017;De Kleijn et al 2018).…”
Section: Natural Palaeogeographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include a semi-quantitative review of the local research history, a discussion of site distributions with respect to modern land use, the nature and intensity of archaeological field work as well as statistical investigations on the impact of erosion, colluviation and weathering conditions on the preservation of prehistoric sites [ 38 – 40 ]. Furthermore, comparisons of archaeological site distributions to random point distributions as well as (predictive) modelling approaches are applied to the study of former settlement dynamics [ 11 , 37 , 41 – 43 ]. (4) Finally, there was a shift from spatial analyses based on point coordinates to studies based either on Site-Catchment Analysis or Site Exploitation Territories (SET) [ 12 , 44 – 51 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%