2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) 2023
DOI: 10.1109/memea57477.2023.10171880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Modelling of Probe Configurations for Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy-based Differentiation of Thyroid and Parathyroid Tissues

Malwina Matella,
Dawn C. Walker,
Keith Hunter
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, uncertainties in the electrical material properties of various cellular and tissue components, which were not investigated in this study, could have added to the observed discrepancies, as discussed in a previous publication [21]. Finally, a previous investigation of the accuracy in the EIS measurements on small structures, such as the parathyroid glands, acquired with the tetrapolar ZedScan TM probe, revealed that probe/parathyroid misalignment could significantly reduce this gland's impedance in the low-frequency region when compared to a symmetrical and precise measurement [42], which could also potentially explain the observed discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, uncertainties in the electrical material properties of various cellular and tissue components, which were not investigated in this study, could have added to the observed discrepancies, as discussed in a previous publication [21]. Finally, a previous investigation of the accuracy in the EIS measurements on small structures, such as the parathyroid glands, acquired with the tetrapolar ZedScan TM probe, revealed that probe/parathyroid misalignment could significantly reduce this gland's impedance in the low-frequency region when compared to a symmetrical and precise measurement [42], which could also potentially explain the observed discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%