2022
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.873609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Screening of Single-Metal-Atom Embedded Graphene-Based Electrocatalysts Stabilized by Heteroatoms

Abstract: Metal-N-doped carbon is a promising replacement for non-precious-metal catalysts such as Pt for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Although these materials have relatively good catalytic activity and are cost-effective, they still have lower ORR activity than Pt, and so improving their performances is greatly required. In this study, high-throughput screening was employed based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations to search for good candidate cat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We modeled the active structures of different transition metals as MN 2 O 2 (O) (M=Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni) based on our FT‐EXAFS fitting results (Table S5, Supporting Information) of all MNOC SAC electrocatalysts, with metal coordinating with two nitrogen and two oxygen atoms in a graphene molecule embedded in epoxy close to the active metal center (see Figure a). The metal binding energies of the MN 2 O 2 (O) active structure models were determined to evaluate thermodynamic stability [ 7b,37 ] (Figure S29, Supporting Information). The metal binding energy values between −3.6 and −6.31 eV show that MN 2 O 2 (O) structures are stable on the carbon support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modeled the active structures of different transition metals as MN 2 O 2 (O) (M=Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni) based on our FT‐EXAFS fitting results (Table S5, Supporting Information) of all MNOC SAC electrocatalysts, with metal coordinating with two nitrogen and two oxygen atoms in a graphene molecule embedded in epoxy close to the active metal center (see Figure a). The metal binding energies of the MN 2 O 2 (O) active structure models were determined to evaluate thermodynamic stability [ 7b,37 ] (Figure S29, Supporting Information). The metal binding energy values between −3.6 and −6.31 eV show that MN 2 O 2 (O) structures are stable on the carbon support.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, the difference in adsorption energy between *OH and *OOH remains constant with a value of 3.2 � 0.2 eV, 106 and ΔG OH is effective in predicting reaction free energies and overpotentials for carbon-supported transition metal single-atom structures, such as single-atom active sites supported on heteroatomcoordinated graphene (MN 4 and MYN 3 ) (Figure 3A), carbon nanocone (CNC) (Figure 3B), graphdiyne, C 2 N, C 3 N 4 , and phthalocyanine. 107,108,110,111 One remarkable discovery is that the carbon nanocone (CNC) embedded with MN 3 groups reported by Deng et al achieved a spectrum of *OH adsorption energy modulation, providing a great possibility in climbing the apex of catalytic activity (Figure 3B). 108 This suggests that carbon nanocone brings new opportunities in exploiting electrocatalysts.…”
Section: Adsorption Energy-based Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the adsorption energy of *OH (Δ G OH ) is a common activity descriptor for H 2 O generation. Commonly, the difference in adsorption energy between *OH and *OOH remains constant with a value of 3.2 ± 0.2 eV, 106 and Δ G OH is effective in predicting reaction free energies and overpotentials for carbon‐supported transition metal single‐atom structures, such as single‐atom active sites supported on heteroatom‐coordinated graphene (MN 4 and MYN 3 ) (Figure 3A), carbon nanocone (CNC) (Figure 3B), graphdiyne, C 2 N, C 3 N 4 , and phthalocyanine 107,108,110,111 . One remarkable discovery is that the carbon nanocone (CNC) embedded with MN 3 groups reported by Deng et al.…”
Section: Reactivity Descriptors For Orrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inaccurate predictions, especially when the sign of the energy difference is wrong, can lead to opposite trends in reaction activity and ultimately the failure of the screening process 30,41 . The challenge of determining the correct sign of the energy difference is heightened when comparing similar adsorption energies.…”
Section: Correct Sign Prediction In Energy Differencementioning
confidence: 99%