2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
3
65
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Our previous study using horizontal images of CT showed that the distance between the mandibular canal and the split surface correlated with TSEP latency recovery. 18 In a previous study 19 , the sagittal split area in the Obwegeser-Dal…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…17 Our previous study using horizontal images of CT showed that the distance between the mandibular canal and the split surface correlated with TSEP latency recovery. 18 In a previous study 19 , the sagittal split area in the Obwegeser-Dal…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Studies on panoramic radiographs showed variations of the mandibular canal according to age, sex, race and development of the alveolar bone (Tronje et al, 1981;Wadu et al, 1997;Oguz & Bozkir, 2002;Yamamoto et al, 2002;Ylikontiola et al, 2002;Tsuji et al, 2005), but only Jung et al (2007) reported the location of the mandibular canal with the type of occlusal class (class III Angle) individuals. Based on the classification of mandibular canal by Nortjé et al and a study by Jung et al (2012), the present study evaluated the position of the mandibular canal in relation to the apices of the lower molars and related to the three classes of occlusal Angle, which so far does not exist in the scientific literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is associated with the surgical manipulations using a saw or osteotome producing direct nerve injury [5,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%