2022
DOI: 10.21608/mjcu.2022.286955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Assessment of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Abstract: patency, we found that it had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 86.2%, NPV of 100%, and PPV of 84%. Conclusion:We reported that CTA is anon-invasive imaging modality with high sensitivity and specificity in assessing graft patency, which may limit the use of invasive conventional angiography especially in patients with comorbidities and liable for devolving complications with invasive conventional angiography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?