2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computed tomography in rheumatology – From DECT to high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For structural joint changes such as bone erosions, the Study grouP for xtrEme‐Computed Tomography in Rheumatoid Arthritis (SPECTRA) collaboration has created a common consensus on how to define and measure these lesions using HR‐pQCT 27 . However, the collaboration has not yet agreed on a definition for BPs 27 . With no standard definition or standard measurement methodology for BPs, direct comparison of study results is not without limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For structural joint changes such as bone erosions, the Study grouP for xtrEme‐Computed Tomography in Rheumatoid Arthritis (SPECTRA) collaboration has created a common consensus on how to define and measure these lesions using HR‐pQCT 27 . However, the collaboration has not yet agreed on a definition for BPs 27 . With no standard definition or standard measurement methodology for BPs, direct comparison of study results is not without limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BPs have a clinical interest as studies have reported the number and size are associated with pain and dysfunction in PsA‐, RA‐ and OA patients 3–5,11,18,19 . For structural joint changes such as bone erosions, the Study grouP for xtrEme‐Computed Tomography in Rheumatoid Arthritis (SPECTRA) collaboration has created a common consensus on how to define and measure these lesions using HR‐pQCT 27 . However, the collaboration has not yet agreed on a definition for BPs 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DECT is particularly beneficial in assessing atypical presentations of CPPD or sites where aspiration is unavailable, as gout and pseudogout can be clinically indistinguishable in the hands and wrist [29]. Figure 3 demonstrates a scenario in which DECT differentiated between monosodium urate crystals and calcium pyrophosphate crystals in the hand [30]. Collagen density mapping can also provide information regarding the ligament integrity of patients with CPPD.…”
Section: Inflammatory Arthropathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest case of 1-material decomposition, which binarizes an image into MSU or not MSU, is referred to herein as dual-thresholding (DT) method. 16,17 These implementations have reported limitations for MSU detection to crystal aggregates greater than 2 mm 12,18 and serum urate concentrations greater than 8.5 mg/dL, 7,19 both of which are typically found in gout patients more than 6 weeks at the time of diagnosis. These techniques are susceptible to voxel misclassification arising from (1) beam-hardening artifacts typically related to bone or metal, which alter the apparent HU values of tissues; (2) nontarget tissues within the HU range of either material pair; (3) threshold values based on high concentrations of MSU, potentially resulting in misclassification of lowconcentration MSU deposits; and (4) partial volume effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%